Author: SustainMe

  • Backup to a Better Backup Generator Solution

    You may already have a backup generator for the house. In
    fact, you may have the backup generator with you just about everywhere you go.
    Plus, it might be totally quiet, for hours.
    Yep, we are talking about your hybrid gas-electric vehicle.
    Hybrids have been selling like crazy on the farms because they can easily be
    used to generate 120-volt electricity to run hand tools and generally provide
    backup power.
    Most newer vehicles offer a 120 plug, but they won’t power
    much. What you need is an inverter that will power whatever you want,
    frequently 300 to 400 watts will be sufficient for many applications. Smaller
    inverters can be simply plugged into a cigarette lighter, but bigger inverters
    should be wired directly to the battery.

    A backup solution for the house is rather awkward,
    inconvenient and requires fuel at a time when the least fuel is available,
    storms and outages. Here’s the cost for a generator solution.
    Generator
    The generator solution costs something like this:
    ·        
    Generator $500 (or about $500 to $1,000 for an
    inverter that is much quieter and provides smoother power).
    ·        
    Fuel, maybe 8 to 12 gals per day. At 10 gals x
    $3 is $30 per day.
    ·        
    Storage of generator and fuel cans.
    Traditional generators (gas or propane or diesel) provide
    lots of smoke, noise, and require maintenance. The generator produces
    electricity, even under very low loads, so much (maybe most) of the electricity
    (and fuel) is wasted.
    Generators are best used some distance from the house so as
    not to asphyxiate the inhabitants.
    Tip. Make sure not to allow the generator to run out of
    fuel, the sputtering causes the generator to surge which kills off appliances
    at an alarming rate.
    Auto with Inverter
    Hooking an inverter to the vehicle may be a very good
    solution for many purposes, especially lower loads in the house such as
    refrigerator, lights and fans. However, you will have to go start the vehicle before
    the battery gets too low. (Taking regular lead batteries below 50% will
    seriously erode their life span.)
    A 1000-Watt inverter can cost between $80 and $110
    (modified-sine wave), and about twice that for the higher quality output of a
    pure-sine wave recommended for sensitive electronics.
    Your vehicle is rather quiet, and rather fuel efficient
    compared to a generator. Your typical vehicle will not be able to handle large
    loads, however. One approach is to set up a battery (or battery bank) that can
    be recharged via the vehicle.
    Even better is to hook up to your hybrid vehicle.
    Hybrid Vehicle with Inverter
    The hybrid vehicle is a wonderful backup power supply, just
    like the uninterruptable power supply (UPS) you use for your computers and wifi.
    You can have continuous power as needed, when needed. Plus, the hybrid vehicle is
    designed to start up the motor and recharge when the collective batteries get
    low. Very cool.
    Here’s how you do it. Hook up your power inverter directly
    to the 12-Volt (direct current) battery of the hybrid vehicle to produce
    alternating current (120 AC). Put the vehicle in the “on” mode, but with all
    the vehicle electronics turned off, i.e., turn the air conditioner and lights
    off. Now, when the batteries run low, the vehicle will automatically start to
    recharge all the batteries, lithium as well as the 12-volt battery.
    Tip: Please make sure the vehicle is in a safely ventilated
    area. Do not set this arrangement up in the garage!
    Add in a Battery
    (Bank) and a Solar Panel (or More)
    So good news, you now have an inverter with your vehicle so
    you can use good, clean, quiet power anywhere you and your Prius happen to be.
    Yippee!
    But how about the home or cabin when the Prius is away?
    Get a battery or more, and hook up the inverter to it. This
    should help you get through several hours with just the refrigerator. Batteries
    of this type (deep cycle, for example) will cost $150 to $350 each.
    Then, get a solar panel, or more, and hook them up to
    recharge your batteries during sunlight hours. (Costco has a 100W Coleman with
    8.5 amp charge controller for $159.)
    Now, I have continuous power for low load (the battery plus
    a 1100W inverter at $90, all for under $400). I’ll buy more batteries and/or
    more solar panels as and when I need them. The 1100-watt inverter does
    everything that I want to do in emergency or in the cabin. It does a small air
    conditioner (window unit or small mini-split for a short period of time; a
    refrigerator for several hours; LED lights and fans for days). It won’t do
    central air, well pump, oven, dryer, hot-water heater, microwave, or several
    heavy load items simultaneously. Bigger load electronics include blenders
    (making Hurricanes and Margaritas), blow dryer; coffee pots, electric saw, etc…
    Be careful putting together your system and your battery
    banks. Hooking two 12V 100 amp batteries together can result in doubling of the
    voltage (48 Volt in series) or double the amps (200 amp hours in parallel)
    depending on how you hook them together. Make sure you get the right inverter
    to match the higher voltage if you go in series. Try to get the same batteries
    if you bank ‘em.
    I can see you eyeing your electric golf cart, you already
    have your own battery bank on wheels. Unfortunately, the voltage will be 36 or
    48 Volts (say 6 x 6-volt batteries hooked up in series is 36 volt). Your
    inverter would need to match the voltage of your cart (or carefully hook up a 12-volt inverter to 12-volt battery equivalent,
    which in this case is two 6-volt batteries).
    In short, you may already have a great backup power supply
    solution. Hook up your hybrid to an inverter and you are good to go. Add in a
    battery (or more) and a solar panel (or more) and you have a nice, quiet,
    renewable power solution.
    Tip. Use a volt meter. The meter is cheap. Burning out electronics
    can be expensive, cause fires, shock the bejeebers out of you, and generally be
    very inconvenient!
    Tip2. When you buy your new hybrid vehicle you get “up to”
    $7,500 back in the form of current-year tax credits! The federal tax credits for new
    EV and PHEV cars (and for home solar, as well) are phasing down, so you might
    want to accelerate your purchasing decisions. (See ins
    and outs of tax credit
    for vehicles at Edmonds.)
    Do we all need to rethink the way the design/plan for (emergency) backup power? Let us know what you think? 

  • Our Sister site, IPZine, just published an article about Sustainable Ag and the Monsanto Dilemma.

    Where Intellectual Property (IP) and Sustainability Meet (GMO and Monsanto)

    Monsanto is an IP Giant.
    Or was. Patented both the herbicide (RoundUP) and GMO crops designed to ignore
    it. But, Monsanto has been less than honest with us. Glyphosate, and Monsanto’s
    fate, in jeopardy. #IPZine #GMO #NonGMO #glyphosate

    RoundUp is a cocktail that contains glyphosate and several “inactive” ingredients. But, don’t take the research on glyphosate to guarantee an exact comparison with RoundUp which contains surfactant(s) among other agents to help the herbicide stick and penetrate. In addition, RoundUp seems to build up over time, especially with increased usage (because of increased week tolerance).
    Combine that with genetically modified crops, and you have a trifecta of experimentation on the world’s food supply.
    Monsanto takes both sides of the bet, making money on the RoundUp side and on the genetically modified crop side. Even though the patents on seeds and on roundup are expiring, Monsanto has been using all means at its disposal to maintain monopoly power (on the US ag markets).
    Plus, there’s RoundUp Ready 2 Yield(r), the next generation.
    Enjoy the read at IPZine and think about how comfortable you are with our US food supply?

  • Corn that fertilizes itself with Nitrogen Fixing bacteria.

    This is a cool article in Science by Ed Young about a giant corn varietal in Sierra Mixe Mexico that grows in very poor soil, but actually fertilizes itself. There’s a bacteria that grows around the roots that absorbs nitrogen from the air and provides it to the corn. The team of researchers led by Alan Bennett from UC Davis referred to this a “Nitrogen Fixing” which works just like roots absorbing nitrogen from the soil.
    In this case, the soil is very poor quality, so the corn actually gathers nitrogen from the air (78% nitrogen for dry air).
    One major disadvantage of this corn is that it takes 8 months to mature.
    The benefits are many. In a linear world of farming, row crops are raise on big farms and the crop shipped off to marked (cities), which deplete the soil. So fertilizers are needed to replenish the soil to grow the next crop. The fertilizers (mainly phosphate and nitrogen) end up running off into the water ways and result in massive ecological damage such as algae blooms and red tide.
    Because fertilizers are expensive to buy, and expensive to apply, farmers continue to do a better job with fertilizers. (Other factors like urbanization, turf grass and golf course are taking over lead positions in pollution generation.)   However, linear systems in farming are non-sustainable, broken systems, compared to Regenerative Farming approaches that use non-til and corp rotations to restore the quality of the soil.
    To commercialize this “nitrogen fixing” cereal crop requires some improvements, new varietals (sexual reproduction) or genetically engineered (GMO crops). The intellectual Property (IP) of such crops will be important. Profits and the capitalist system at work, availability to the people and countries that need it, and the property rights protections that make IP work are just a few important ingredients in the dissemination of new technology — in this case, new crops.

  • Attributes of Successful Sustainable Leaders

    Great article on Sustainable Leaders: The 8 Attributes of Successful Sustainable Leaders by Bob Langert over at GreenBiz.org.
    In our experience and prior research, communications is key to success for the sustainability professional. Yes, communications is a tool, but the first skills needed are communications: both internal, external and collaborative. Marketing internally is simply rallying the troupes, and demonstrating the case, including the value proposition. Externally, it is some combination of public relations, promotion, marketing and sales in order to demonstrate the value to customers business partners and the public.
    Getting the government to work with, not against, sustainability is often very tricky since there are often many players with very short term interests that run against sustainability (real estate developers, coal and oil, for example).
    So let’s gauge the 8 attributes (although I don’t think they were in any particular order) by Langert toward the level of communications involved:

    • Courage. Courage to speak up for what is the right thing to do.
    • Conviction. 
    • Cleverness. 
    • Contrariness. 
    • Collaboration. This is the one factor that fully requires communications at all levels. Plus it is one of the main attributes of traditional leadership: collaborative vs. authoritative. 
    • Cheerfulness. Funny, but true.
    • Charisma. A traditional leadership approach/style that has been demonstrated to work in getting people to follow a leader.
    • Humility. Being humble does require a special kind of communications. 

    We are all in the world of sustainability together. The trick is to get people to think long(er) term and then back up to best decisions for everyone in the present. Although you can’t argue with Langert’s list of 7 Cs and and H, you have to admit that it doesn’t really capture the full nature of a successful leader in the world of sustainability.
    It does give those of us who are trying to be successful in sustainability efforts, something to think about.

  • Internet will be underwater sooner than you might think

    Found this on the Weather Channel, where it discusses a study that discusses the impacts on rising oceans on… The Internet.
    It makes sense. Population centers are, what, 80% within a few miles of oceans. All the phone and Inet cables would run along roads through population areas…
    Business Insider discusses so called Sunny Day Flooding from high tied and kind tide.
    As the sea levels rise there will be more flooding. Flooding will start to hit lots of underground cables (including Internet cables) that are water resistant, but not waterproof.

    With all the analysis of Global Warming, most of the scenarios assume that we take some action to avoid the worst cases. Also, there had been expectations for 20-30 years that we would start to run out (or at least low) on the fossil fuels, and thereby increase costs from shortages would result in “conservation” efforts. But Fracking and horizontal drilling has changed all that. Ten years ago, noone, not even the oil baron Boone Pickens, could expect that the world would reach 100m barrels of oil per day. It was not conceivable. But we have made it. Happily burning away, even with generally more fuel-efficient vehicles.

    But the Business as Usual (BAU) models that were considered the absolute worst case in climate models, seems to be where we find ourselves. The general thinking was that we probably had about another 50 years before big problems from global warming come home to roost. Well, this study figures otherwise. Within 10-15 years these problems, and the associated plethora of costs, should start showing up with a vengeance.

    The water issues will be massive and devastating. Salt water intrusion will become really expensive. Imagine entire cities moving from lots of fresh water and fresh water wells, to no fresh water. Desalinization is obviously possible, but requires lots of energy, plus massive amounts of plant and infrastructure.

    And, we have not even begun to talk about the devastating impacts of hurricanes when the sea levels are a couple more feet above “normal”.

    No pretty pictures on the waterfront here!