Author: SustainMe

  • Corps report on sustainability, kinda

    Good news corporations are reporting on sustainability-related issues, especially those risks associated with operating a business that does not account or consider the areas where they are not sustainable. Operations in the UnSustainable Zone have lots of risks such as, for example, the company may not really be profitable. Cheap coal, is not nearly so cheap when you figure in all the negative externalities: pollution, health, CO2, coal ash…

    Check out this WSJ article about the reporting, or lack thereof, of sustainability by large companies. First, 81% of companies report something, but 52% of those reporting used “boilerplate language to flag the risks without articulating management response strategies.”  That would mean, if I understand it correctly, that only 42% of big firms report meaningful information on sustainability and the risks to the organization. But using Sustainability Accounting Standards Board, or SASB, would give the reader/investor meaningful information about the true profitability (economic profit) and the underlying risks. (See wikipedia on SASB or SASB.org.)


    I know what you are thinking… These area the same types of risks that Sarbanes-Oxley was supposed to address. If the risks are real, and material, then they must be meaningfully assessed and reported. Right?

    Top Companies Are Disclosing Sustainability Risks, But Not The Way Investors Want
    By 

  • Trump of Sustainability – Paul Bunyan tromps again!

    Sustainability efforts take a big hit with the Trump election to president.
    Some forces are bigger than he, however.
    Congress didn’t act on most things sustainable-ish, so much of the Obama efforts have been by executive order and by regulations. The EPA on coal, for example. The right way to regulate emissions in general — and fossil fuels specifically — is by a carbon tax (or cap n trade). With a carbon tax, then all subsidies of all kinds can be readily removed and let the markets take care of resource allocation. New power and retirement of existing production takes care of itself.
    So now, we can expect the EPA restrictions to be systematically eroded.
    But, even if the EPA is removed from the picture, we should never expect to see another coal power plant. NatGas is so much cheaper — in all the spellings of the word — and dirt cheap. See our blog post on coal here.
    One would hope, however, that Trump would take on bigger and more immediate issues before attacking the Paris agreement on climate change (COP21, and COP22 starting as we speak in Marrakesh). That is taking on a big segment of the US population and the will of the entire world that, up until Paris a year ago, has never agreed on many thing since the Montreal agreement on reducing fluorocarbons (and the recent extension of this in Oct-Nov 2016).
    When we saw Virginia coming in all red, and only flipping blue based on metro areas (DC), you knew that Trumps message had really grabbed traction with the blue collar coal miners and such.
    Sadly, the idea of putting coal back to work, is a painful lie to the mining community. Coal is never going to come back. Countries like Germany have totally retired the coal power. Even China may not put any more coal power plants to work; they’re trying to get the air clean enough for people to breath.
    The idea from Hillary was that she would make efforts to transition the “dead and dying back in my little [coal] town”. The promise from Trump to put coal miners back to work is sadly a very cruel promise. Wishing it were true, does not make it so.
    You have to feel for the miners though.
    First we backed out of the Kyoto protocol, now we will back out of Paris. You have to really feel for those countries 200 countries that have been pushing so hard to address the huge footprint we are having on the planet, while the US, the Paul Bunyan of footprints, is putting on his BIG boots to go tromping again.
    An added note is the horror story of a team that has been advising Trump on Energy and Environment, aka the agency formerly know as the EPA. This Scientific America article was in Sept 26th.

  • Oh Frack… Ain't no such thang clean oil n gas!

    You’ve heard that there ain’t no such thing as “Clean” Coal. Maybe scrubbing some of the sulpher and removing some of the heavly metals. But certainly not clean. And then there’s the dirty little secret of Coal Ash!.
    But this article sums up the current research related to fracking. Ouch. Evidense keeps mounting about the down-side of oil fracking. This article really sums it up. 
    Link to the Ecologist article on Fracking.
    Of course, our argument here at SustainZine, is focused around the sustainability nature of fossil fuels in general. It’s okay, kinda, to use fossil fuels, but only do so when you have a long term plan that is sustainable, and this is the bridge to the future.
  • Google got it wrong. The open-office trend is destroying the workplace. – The Washington Post

    Google got it wrong. The open-office trend is destroying the workplace. – The Washington Post:

    This is a great article about the “open air” cubicle farm for workers. Or “fish bowl” for employees.

    Telecommuting would help this work better. If someone has a real deadline and real work that needs to be done, they could work at home. Try to schedule meetings priority days so people who need to meet can all be on campus on specific days of the week (or month).

    Productivity will go up. Huge amounts of savings will occur for everyone, and employees will be a whole lot happier. Wait until we really hit full employment and watch the fish start to migrate to better working conditions. (Economists used to think that 6% was full employment, now 5%. Moving past full employment tends to produce wage inflation as the only available human resources can be obtained by enticing talent from a friendly competitor.)

    Teleworking might save the fishbowl, but it seems likely that the fishbowl has cracks.

    ‘via Blog this’

  • ipZine: The world’s first super light folding electric bike | YikeBike

    ipZine: The world’s first super light folding electric bike | YikeBike:

    This posted over at ipZine.The world’s first super light folding electric bike | YikeBike: )

    Even cooler than the Segway, and multiple times as functional.

    Give a look at this YikeBike. When you see this bike, you will say Yikes!

    It is reminisce of the old High Wheeler bikes with the monster wheel in front, and no gears (1-speed). But with a twist.

    The question to ask is this new bike a true invention? Is it innovation? Or is it both?

    It won the Time Magazine’s intention of the year in 2009. Finalist in Nobel’s Prize for Sustainability.

    Part of that question might be answered by how many patents the technology harbors.

    The main international PCT patent (2008-2009) has been filed in about 8 countries and does not appear to be issued yet. There are other interesting patent technologies integrated into the design. Here’s the main patent WO2010007516A1 from the EPO.

    It seems like a great alternative to the idea of our usual approach to jump into our SUV and drive a few streets to work or for a latte — 180 pound person being transported by a 2,000 vehicle using a 300-400 horse power motor.

    This idea seems to solve several problems with the bike as a mode of transportation, some problems that we never really knew we had.

    When you look at the product, you will wonder where the motor and the batteries hide.

    How does it keep from falling over in 3 different directions?

    What is a “farthing” and how can it possibly be considered a great selling point? Even if you call it a “mini-farthing”. Do we really need a secondary axis, orthogonal to the primary axis?

    Can you take your YikeBike on your man bike (Harley) without being called out for having a “girlie-man bike”?

    Where can you get a YikeBike? Apparently, they have free international shipping.

    YikeBike comes with “the freedom to park wherever I DAMN please!”

    Will people say, “Wow”, “Cool” and “hip”, or will they say:

    “Yikes!”???

    Translation to English: The Carbon Fiber Model C weighs 25 lbs. goes about 14 mph max with a range of 12 miles. The model V weighs 30lbs (or 34 for the 3-wheeled V version).

    Colour means Color in English and pictures pretty much speak for themselves without translation. Bet they even drive on the wrong side of the road?!

    ‘via Blog this’