Author: SustainMe

  • Fuel cell cars from Toyota, Honda, Hyundai set to debut at auto shows – latimes.com

    Fuel cell cars from Toyota, Honda, Hyundai set to debut at auto shows – latimes.com:

    We’ve been waiting for decades (50 years?) for a fuel cell car.

    It looks like Toyota will come out fist with a Fuel Cell car next year.

    The fuel cell being announced this next week are coming from Honda and Hyundai.

    Unfortunately, it seems, these will be hydrogen fuel based.

    Other versions of Fuel Cell generators use liquid fuels, not straight hydrogen. Without fueling stations for hydrogen the technology is stuck where LP  and LNG was 10 years ago before Clean Energy (and others) started putting up liquid natgas stations along the trucking corridors.

    Let’s see what the announcement(s) bring.

    ‘via Blog this’

  • As BP oil spill trial resumes, lying accusations bubble up – CBS News

    As BP oil spill trial resumes, lying accusations bubble up – CBS News:

    Everyone remembers the  massive Gulf oil spill starting April 20, 2010 and 87 days of spillage.

    As we all watched the pictures from the surface oil slick and the underwater cameras at the well head, it was a tale of two oil spills.

    BP: trickle … => Media: deluge
    BP: gallons … => Media: barrels

    BP: creek  => river

    But the truth is, no one anywhere believed the BP numbers.

    They really had no recovery plan. As this article said, they only had a plan to create a plan, if and when they needed a plan.

    Disaster recovery plans for businesses have details that have been well thought through. One page for a wellhead breach under water is not exactly a detailed plan.

    The dispersant (Corexit) works at the surface with sunlight and such. However about 45% of the Corexit was used at the well head, resulting in oil that was stuck in limbo half way to the surface. At the surface it can be removed and/or treated.

    More importantly, apparently, for BP was that at the surface it can more accurately be MEASURED.

    The difference between the 4.2m Barrels by Justice department experts and the 2.45mb by BP is almost half. Of course the BP numbers wrong. Is it more than 4.2mb, probably. Less, probably not.

    Additionally, however, the $1,100 penalty max per barrel (~42 gal/brl) would be essentially 4 times that ($4,300/brl) if BP is found negligent.

    That’s the difference between $18B in fines and about $2.7B (BP’s low-ball estimates and the lower fine).

    There really is, however, lots of blame to go around. The regulatory agency that rubber-stamped everything oil and mining related has now be disbanded in disgrace. The “plans” were the same for all oil drillers. Everyone was doing the same types of drilling, although maybe not quite the lax monitoring/procedures.

    AND the government had a limit on the exposure for drillers in a very cozy relationship with the oil companies. It was a paltry amount… with the official rationale of promoting drilling (and oil independence). Of course, that limitation was immediately revoked.

    Can you imagine if BP were a smaller player that simply went bankrupt? The good thing about a BIG company with deep pockets (pun) is that you can make ’em pay, and then keep making them pay.

    In the end, the oil industry is a far safer place because of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

    Here are some lessons learned (and used).

    ‘via Blog 

  • el capitan, my capitan. Yosemite hits 123rd birthday.

    So it seems that Yosemite National Park is 123 years old today. Today, Google pays trubute www.Google.com.  Links to Yosemite search.

    The massive rim fire has brought the Yosemite and Sequoya Parks back into full view. Even if you have only seen them once in your lifetime, it is one of the great spiritual experiences.

    El Capitan, my capitan.

  • Social Good Summit 2013 – Social Good Summit

    Social Good Summit 2013 – Social Good Summit:

    Here’s a video of the conference on United Nations Foundation, Gates Foundation and more. on Social Good Summit 2013… Conference runs from Sept 22 – 24, New York, NY.

    Al Gore is in this too.

    Hash tag I guess is #2030now

    Check out the LP Recharge game, Kuuluu.com. Part of the UN movement to have affordable, renewable energy for all. 1.3B people do not have access to energy. Maybe 3B don’t really have safe and affordable energy.

    Very interesting.

    Not quite the balance of the business and economic engine for development and wealth creation that we would like to see. But some very good stuff here.

    ‘via Blog this’

  • Natural gas, the media’s failures, and you « The Cost of Energy

    Natural gas, the media’s failures, and you « The Cost of Energy:

    Ouch!

    “The Cost of Energy” Lou Grinzo blogs (and reblogs) about how unclear NatGas really is. It all has to do with the Methane released from the fracking.

    See the reprint of the blog at EthicsAndClimate.org from Dr. Brown.

    Sadly NatGas may really not be cleaner than Coal. How dirty is that!

    Here’s my comments over to Lou’s post.
    Okay, as always, your blogs are extremely informative, with lots of facts that are well substantiated. The Dr. Brown article is a real eye opener on fracking.

    Ouch! This is ugly. So we really don’t gain anything from NatGas except maybe fuel independence — and a wonderful improvement to our US trade (im)balance!:-(

    The question I have for all of this NatGas is here and now. Half of the NatGas in the US is flared. So when we say that NatGas is 50% cleaner than coal, do we count the other 100% that is flared in the making? Oh, wait, we aren’t saying that NatGas is actually cleaner than coal. It may not be!

    Don’t get me wrong, there’s a safety and a transport issue here with flaring…

    Good news is that much of the flaring is probably methane, right? So it could be worse, there might not be as much flaring. Simply releasing the methane would be a hefty magnitude worse?

    And, of course, the point is that there should be no (short-term) plan to switch to NatGas without some follow-on plan to switch completely to sustainable fuel/power.

    Much like our US energy policy, if there is one, the short-term plan is the only plan, even though it is based on exhaustible resources. That is, the plan is broken as designed.

    Non-sustainability, over time, has a way of giving a wicked whiplash effect. And somehow, everyone with this broken short-term plan feel warm and cuddly about it.

    Double ouch!

    ‘via Blog this’