Category: Disruptive Innovation

  • Disruptive Innovation: Why AI Will Spark Exponential Economic Growth

     The innovation and investment guru
    Cathy Wood gave a TED talk in December 2023 about 5 pivotal innovation platforms
    that will (continue) to change the world as we know it. Her group expects to
    see exponential sustained growth that is fueled by the productivity gains in
    these areas, especially where they converge. The 5 platforms (AI, Robotics,
    Energy Storage, DNA sequencing, and blockchain) are described below, with AI in
    the center. One example she uses is the rapid move to self-driving taxis.
    TED talk with Cathy Wood, Why AI Will Spark Exponential
    Economic Growth
    . (2023, Dec. 18). 

    The productivity gains are so huge and
    so sustained that it will dramatically change the global economy with sustained
    GDP growth of 6% to 8%. Productivity gains can be distributed (at the macro
    level) in three ways: higher wages, higher profits, and deflation. She expects
    all 3. Note disinflation, is the slowing rate of inflation while deflation
    is negative growth in prices. This means that more goods and more services can
    be produced more cheaply. Usually we think of lowering prices – deflation –
    coming as a result of a good recession, i.e., destructive innovation.

    This new AI economy will create a
    whole new type of disruptive innovation. Disruption to the workforce will be
    massive: taxi drivers, truck drivers, coders, factory workers, designers. The
    US that has been stuck at full employment (less than 4% unemployed) will
    suddenly get some relief. The people who develop the new skills will have very
    high-paying jobs, others will be left out.

    Wood argues that the Federal Reserve,
    that has been so worried about inflation for so long, is way behind the curve, because
    productivity and sustained economic growth are already here. The Fed’s new job,
    soon, will be managing the drop in interest rates and deflation.

    The old nautical adage: a rising tide
    raises all boats. A rapidly growing world economy will raise most boats: some
    boats a lot, some a lot faster than others.

    You: Summarize the 5
    technologies that Cathy Wood believes will converge to produce exponential
    economic growth.

    Copilot (2024, April 4)

    Investor Cathie
    Wood
     envisions a unique moment in technology marked by the
    simultaneous evolution of five pivotal innovation platforms. These
    platforms are converging, creating unprecedented opportunities for growth and
    transformation. Here are the five technologies she highlights:

    1. Artificial Intelligence (AI):
      • AI is
        reshaping economic paradigms.
      • Predicts a
        surge in global GDP growth and productivity.
      • Drives
        exponential productivity growth.
    2. Robotics:
      • Robotics
        advancements are accelerating.
      • Automation and
        efficiency gains across industries.
    3. Energy Storage:
      • Energy storage
        solutions are evolving rapidly.
      • Enables
        renewable energy adoption and grid stability.
    4. DNA Sequencing (Multiomic Sequencing):
      • Advances in
        DNA sequencing technology.
      • Revolutionizes
        healthcare, personalized medicine, and biotechnology.
    5. Blockchain Technology:
      • Blockchain’s
        decentralized ledger system.
      • Disrupts
        finance, supply chains, and data security.

    Wood emphasizes the need for businesses and investors
    to adapt to this convergence to stay ahead in the changing landscape. These
    technologies hold immense potential for exponential economic growth!
    🚀🌐💡

    #Innovation #DisruptiveInnovation #AI
    #ArtificialIntellegence #Blockchain #Robotics #GenAI

    Wood, C. (2023, Dec. 18). Why AI Will Spark Exponential
    Economic Growth. TED Talks. Retrieved from: https://youtu.be/rQEh7d-qa38?feature=shared

  • Misery Index (and Pain Index)

    The Misery Index hasn’t been talked about much since the
    1970s when unemployment was really high and inflation was double digit. The
    argument is that high unemployment is painful, and high inflation is painful,
    so when you add the two together you get a good measure of the misery throughout
    the economy. Both presidents Ford and Carter had average Misery indexes of 16,
    but Carter when out of office in 1980 leaving a Misery Index of almost 20 to
    Ronald Reagan.

    Pain Index

    Wikipedia does a great job of organizing information and
    trends related to Misery Index
    by country over time. The article presents 2013 as an example year, just a
    couple years out of the worldwide Great Recession of 2007-2008. Several
    countries had Misery Indexes of 60 or more (Venezuela, 79.4 and Iran, 61.6).  The US had a Misery Index of 11 in 2013,
    predominantly because of persistently higher unemployment, inflation was below
    2%.) High inflation, or even hyperinflation, is usually associated with an
    unstable economy.  In 2019, Venezuela had
    a Miser Index that was basically unmeasurable because of inflation that was
    1000% or far higher.

    In the 1980s, many Latin American countries had business
    relations and huge debts that amplified the misery from the US, especially
    loans that were payable in US Dollars. Many countries had misery indexes that
    were twice that of the USA. Ouch!

    Full Employment

    Full employment was considered by economists at about 6% unemployment.
    Six percent seemed like a good level of unemployed to allow for people moving
    from location to location, job to job, entering and leaving the workforce. So,
    the base misery index would be about 6 at full employment and 0% inflation. But
    as we got into the 21st century, especially about 6 years after the
    Great Recession, it became clear that full employment could be less than 6%,
    Maybe 5%? At end of Obama era and into Trump years, unemployment moved down to
    about 4%. With extremely low inflation, the Misery index dropped to a total of
    about 5 or 6 in the US.

    Modified Misery Index (MI+)

    Some economists like to modify the misery index to reduce
    the index by the amount of GDP growth.

    Misery Index = Unemployment + Inflation (or MI = U + I)

    Misery+ = Unemployment + Inflation – GDP Growth (MI+ = U + I
    GDP
    )

    The pain of unemployment is obvious for the unemployed. For
    the economy, a year in which a person is unemployed also a year lost worth of
    GDP contribution from that person; let’s say a loss of GDP of twice (2x) that
    person’s salary.

    US Misery Index (MI+) 2001 thru 2021

    The pain of inflation is not so obvious. If inflation is 5%
    and wages increase by 5%, then the average employee is equally well off.
    Central bankers tend to aim for 1%, but less than 2% inflation. Higher inflation
    can destabilize the economy (more) because it increases uncertainty and reduces
    the ability of businesses, governments, and individuals to plan (and invest).

    If the economy is growing, let’s say because of productivity
    growth, then that can offset the level of pain and misery. Productivity growth
    can be roughly represented in GDP growth. 

    Coming out of the Great Recession of 2008, unemployment had
    risen to about 18%, inflation was consistently low, close to zero; and GDP
    growth was chugging along at 2% to 3%.  The
    Misery Index was about 20. MI+ was about 17 (when reduced by 2%-3% GDP growth)
    which looks better but is still painful. No one wanted to give up a job if they
    had one; and getting a job if you had none, was ugly. This was misery and pain,
    and the US was in much better positions than many countries (even though the
    Great Recession was totally manufactured in the US housing asset bubble).
    Countries that relied on tourism were hammered by the lack of visitors. No
    business travel. The normal vacationers were hit by a triple whammy: no job, or
    job uncertainty; the crash of savings and retirement funds; and the collapse of
    the housing market where people were struggling to keep their homes or had
    already lost them. Ouch! That was painful.

    Recessions: Destructive Innovation

    Recessions are good, and bad.

    An old economics joke (if there are really any economic
    jokes, maybe pun is better) is: What is the difference between a recession and a
    depression? A recession is when your neighbor loses his job; a depression
    is when you lose your job.

    Recessions are destructive innovation. They accelerate the
    retirement of old business models toward new and better. The Great Recession of
    2008 and the Pandemic Recession of 2020, both accelerated transitions away from
    big malls. The Recession 2020 massively accelerated online shopping and the
    ability of employees to work from anywhere (telework). Surprisingly, most
    businesses and schools didn’t really have the full ability to work online
    (security, bandwidth, collaboration); now they can. Big campuses and office
    buildings may never go back to full capacity.

    On the macro level, the economy in 2019 was zipping along at
    approximately full employment (4.5%) and a GDP of about $21.5T. During the big
    pandemic shutdown in 2Q2020, the economy shrunk about 30%. That’s a lot like
    turning off all the (economic) engines and diming all the lights with the hopes
    that all the moving parts of the economy would be operational and in place when
    the power comes back on. It seems that pandemic relief and the resilience of
    the businesses/people allowed for a jump start back out of the recession.
    Economic growth in 3Q2020 was +33%. By the end of 2021, the economy is/was
    zipping along at about $23T annual GDP. Wow.

    But the economy is different in small and big ways. The
    pre-pandemic economy was 70% services (69%, actually). Now people are buying
    more goods and only 65.5% services. Both the goods, and the services are
    different now. Very little international travel, so countries relying on
    international leisure and business travelers are getting hammered. More to fix
    up your house. Try buying a boat, an RV, an ATV, an auto, or a house!  People are buying differently; think Amazon,
    eBay, Etsy. 

    The toilet paper problem during the pandemic was that there
    were two supply chains for toilet paper: the soft and cushy 2-ply for
    households, and coarse (Brillo pad) single-ply for businesses and government.
    Turns out they were totally different supply chains.

    Changes in supply chains, increased demand along many supply
    chains and supply interruptions (labor, containers, etc.) all resulted in
    shortages and cost increases. The biggest factor in 2021 inflation is energy,
    which filters through all aspects of the economy into the food chain and supply
    chains.

    Oil demand went back above 100 million barrels per day, in
    an industry (fossil fuels) that needs to be discontinued sooner, not later, to
    meet climate goals. The transition away from fossil fuels, will be disruptive. Why
    invest more in rigs, pipelines, and tankers if the entire industry needs to be
    phased down in 10 years and phased out in 30 years?

    BIG oil (Saudi, Russia, Exxon, etc.) is hoping we will never
    make the switch off our oil-addiction… After 40 years of talking about it, they
    seem to be largely correct. 

    Healthy Consumers

    During the Pandemic Recession, many people saved lots of
    money. First, there was no good place to spend money, except maybe to fix up
    your house. The Federal Government shoveled out buckets of money to families.
    And, for those people who kept their jobs, most of them had suddenly reduced
    their monthly expenses in traveling to work and eating out.  Staycations, not vacations. Personal and
    Institutional savings went from just over $1T in 2019 to $4T 1Q2021 (BEA.gov).

    Housing values have jumped by 30%, 40% or even 50% in many
    locations, leaving those people lucky enough to own housing real estate in a
    very sweet position. Selling may be the easiest it has been in decades. Low
    interest rates and very few properties for sell. Since the Great Recession we have
    built far too few houses, so there really is a bit of a housing shortage; no
    bubble in sight. Of course, people looking to buy, or rent, are not going to be
    happy.

    The stock market, and retirement funds, have gone only up
    since the great recession. There was a retraction for the pandemic, but
    otherwise it has continued to go higher. In 2021, all the US markets were up
    dramatically with the S&P 500 up 25+%, hitting 70 all-time highs throughout
    the year. Many market analysists think a small correction, or even a big
    correction, is near; but the bulls seem to be winning almost every week.

    So, let’s see if we have this right? Unemployment is the
    lowest it has been in our lifetime. Employment opportunities are the best they
    have every been with job openings exceeding the applicants by 2 or 3 times. If
    people want to go back into the workforce they can, but they can probably
    afford not to work for the indefinite future. The house is probably worth
    several times what you paid for it. Investments are good and retirement fund is
    bulging at the seams. Your old car is worth more than you paid for it 5 years
    ago.

    Inflation is up, especially for housing, fuel, and food;
    but, if your salary is up as well, that shouldn’t be too bad. The cost-of-living
    increase is 5.9% for retirees who probably own their house and don’t drive
    much.

    Your biggest problem is you must wait 6 months for your new
    car; and you may have to postpone, again, your international vacation. Consumers
    may be in better positions than they have been in years.

    Why do many people think the economy is in the toilet and
    why are so many people so anxious?

    Anxiety and Fear

    The consumer is probably better, financially, then he or she has been for a couple decades. But COVID uncertainty and political divisiveness has wreaked havoc. And then there is the new, wildly prolific, Omicron strain of COVID-19. Normally during times of war or major uncertainty, the US has pulled together. Not this time. That doesn’t seem to be happening. 

    Somehow, we seem to have dropped into the abyss that news outlets have fallen into. Good news, and even great stats, are a yawn. Bad news, with death and mayhem, that’s news! So, news outlets have moved to sensationalizing. And talking heads perpetually pander to their base. It is hard to find fair and unbiased sources, and most people have gotten to where they don’t want or believe real news. 

    Fear mongering seems to work, at least to build followers. 

    And everyone is always stressed out. Even if things are really quite good, all things considered. Especially when considering that we’ve had two-year of pandemic, and more than 800,000 US deaths associated with COVID. We’ve had a world economy come to a complete stop and now we are some 5% further than before. That is pretty spectacular. 

    Look at how far we have come up the mountain range, not at the last high peak. Imagine how easy things might be if we all worked together? 

    #Innovation #DestructiveInnovation #MiseryIndex #Inflation
    #Unemployment #EconomicDevelopment




  • Cool Motor that Runs on Air

    A lot like a perpetual motor: no fool’n.
    As a kid, college really, I was intrigued about the idea of a “perpetual” motor. A motor that ran forever. My idea seemed like it should work, but I had a hard time getting someone to explain why it wouldn’t. My idea was based on the flywheel of the single engine Briggs & Stratton where a magnet on the flywheel creates the spark for the ignition on each rotation. My idea was to have magnets that attract the flywheel and a reverse magnet to repel the flywheel once it got past. But I had the problem that the flywheel would get attracted and stuck. So I found something called paramegnetic materials, materials that repel both positive and negative magnetic forces. All I needed, then is to have a thin sheet of paramagnetic material pass between the attracting magnets to let the flywheel move on to the repelling magnet. Perfect, a perpetual motor.
    I finally got to talk with a Physics professor at USF who explained my small, but subtle issue with the perpetuity of my motor. When you use a magnet, you loose a magnet. It took energy to magnetize a magnet, so the process of using it will deplete it!
    For decades, there have been articles about perpetual motors… But generally they have gone the way of “cold fusion”.
    Here is a very cool article/technology on a motor that runs on air. Liquefied Nitrogen, actually. Very cool. Literally, about -210 C (or -340 F). So, if the internal combustion motor works on the temperature differential before the ignition of fuel and after ignition, the liquid nitrogen concept works in the same way: from really really cold, to cold. Not nearly the same as the 1,000 times differential from gasoline, but still an effective motor. Effective only once you overcome the problem of things freezing up in the process.
    So here’s the great Wired article by Nicola Twilley about the inventor Peter Dearman: A One-Time Poultry Farmer Invents the Future of
    Refrigeration: Mechanical cooling revolutionized the global food supply—and
    accelerated global warming. Peter Dearman’s liquid air engine could change all
    that.

    The thing that Dearman had to overcome is to bring the temp of the super cold nitrogen up enough that it didn’t freeze up the works. (Kind of a reverse of the radiator idea to cool the motor down.)
    So the motor works, not especially efficient, but it works.
    However, your favorite internal combustion engine is very inefficient. Your car is only about 15% efficient. Diesel turbine motors for electricity are generally about 40% efficient, at best… Unless… Unless you need the excess heat. So if you can use the heat, like hot water on a campus environment, then the combined heat and power (CHP) can be very efficient, maybe up to about 70%.
    Imagine if you could use the cool from a liquid nitrogen engine? Say, hypothetically, for refrigerated storage or reefer. (No, not a Jimmy Buffet kind of Reefer!:-) A refrigerated reefer truck.
    And, wa la. You have a really great method of efficiently transporting and simultaneously cooling perishable products.
    The cryogenic reefer truck seems to be really gaining traction (sorry about the pun) within several food chains.
    Very cool!
    Dearman says the nitrogen solution will result in a 40% improvement over diesel in terms of greenhouse gases. If is the nitrogen is liquefied (chilled) by renewable energy the improvement compared to diesel moves up to 95%.
    Even Cooler!
    It also helps to overcome the need for Freon or the replacements for Freon. (Fluorocarbons are a wicked greenhouse gas that blow holes in the ozone layer.)
    With 78% of the Earth’s atmosphere, nitrogen (N) is readily abundant.
    Dearman has several patents related to cryogenics and cryogenic motors.
    Interestingly, it would appear that the same Peter (T?) Dearman is also the inventor of respirators and ventilators back in 1990!

  • FinTech unicorns are taking out some BIG bank Donkeys

    Here’s a great InfoGraphic about the FinTech market and the unicorns ($2B startups) that are hanging out, and disrupting, in the Financial space.
    Natania K brought it up on LinkedIn:

    Our Global Startup Heat Map showcases 4 top asset management solutions, ready to impact the energy industry: http://bit.ly/2L2FlfE

    I love this “Innovation Map” and the unicorns are proof positive that the addressable market of some of the slices of new Fin Services are addressable and viable (now or soon). So the trillion dollar question is: what does the brick and mortar (BnM) have in store. BnM are looking in the rear-view mirror, and they have low visibility of the future. The reason that they have low visibility, is because — after a couple hundred years of doing business in the office — it is hard to change the stripes on a donkey.

    But the changes they are a come’n, and the storefronts will be a closing.
    FinTech unicorns are going to be taking out some BIG bank Donkeys that are hanging out on every major business corner.
    What do you think, what FinTech services are most disruptive?
  • XGame Innovation in Carbon Capture

    Look at the great innovations up in Canada in the CCS xGames.

    Checkout the blog at SustainZine related to this very cool competition: http://sustainzine.blogspot.com/2017/01/co2-xgame-winners-in-canada-losers-in.html

    Here’s some info on this big competition in Canada: CBC News discusses competition sponsored by Canada’s Oil Sands Innovation Alliance and U.S. company NRG.

    Normally you think of Carbon Capture & Sequester as a dead cost. Take carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere (maybe at a smoke stack where it is highly concentrated, and pump it down into caverns, maybe where the coal or oil came from. But CO2 is a valuable and sell-able byproduct. Think about the fizz in your pop.

    Maybe innovation like this Carbon XGame contestants have demonstrated, might allow us to burn all the oil and coal in the world without impunity. Maybe if we all hold our breath (one way to reduce CO2), the impact of our non-sustainable ways will not come back to bite us in the proverbial butt.

    SustainZine said: That means the the job of the CCS might turn out to be far, far bigger in the future, as we try to burn up the last century or so of fossil fuels over the next hundred years.

    We here at SustainZine consider “conservative” this way: The bestest, cheapest, cleanest gallon of gas is the one never extracted, never processed and never burned. The bestest, cheapest, cleanest tonne of coal is the one never extracted, never processed, and never burned (scrubbing or no scrubbing).”  


    In the meanwhile, innovation is the engine that will keep providing options, long after the most obvious alternatives have been exhausted.