Category: productivity

  • When is a President or Justice too Old to Serve

    The
    age of presidential candidates has become a central issue in American politics,
    particularly in the lead-up to the 2024 election. This topic has gained
    unprecedented attention following a series of events that have reshaped the
    political landscape.

    Perplexity.ai
    (2024, October 15) with prompts by E. Hall. Image produced by DALL-E with
    prompts by E. Hall.

    The 2024 Presidential Race: A Turning Point

    The
    2024 presidential race took an unexpected turn when incumbent President Joe
    Biden, at 81 years old, made the surprising decision to drop out of the race.
    This decision came after mounting concerns about his age and perceived
    cognitive decline, which became increasingly apparent in public speeches and
    during a pivotal debate with former President Donald Trump
    .

    Biden’s
    withdrawal marked a significant shift in the political narrative, as it removed
    the oldest serving president in U.S. history from the race. This development
    left former President Donald Trump, at 78, as the oldest major party candidate
    in the running.

    Trump’s Age Paradox

    Despite
    being only three years younger than Biden, Trump has faced less scrutiny
    regarding his age. A Gallup poll conducted before Biden’s withdrawal showed
    that while 67% of Americans believed Biden was too old to be president, only
    37% held the same view about Trump.

    However,
    Trump’s own statements have added a layer of irony to the age debate. In an
    October 16, 2024 interview, Trump remarked, “Only stupid people put old
    [people into office], … You know, you don’t put old in, because they’re there
    for two years or three years, right?” This statement, made in reference to
    his selection of younger Supreme Court justices, notably avoided addressing the
    question of his own advanced age. [
    Cite]

    Public Perception and Political Implications

    The
    age factor has significantly influenced public perception of the candidates. A
    survey conducted by Pew Research Center found that Americans have mixed views
    about how the news media covers the ages of presidential candidates.

    The
    poll revealed that while 32% of Americans believe news organizations give too
    much attention to Biden’s age, only 19% feel the same about Trump’s age.

    This
    disparity in perception has political implications. Republicans are more likely
    to say that Biden’s age is getting too little attention (48%), while Democrats
    tend to believe Trump’s age is underreported (46%).

    Historical Context

    The
    current focus on age is not without precedent. Throughout U.S. history, there
    have been several older presidents who have left their mark on the nation.
    Ronald Reagan, who took office at 69, and Dwight D. Eisenhower, who served
    until 70, are notable examples.

    The Debate Over Age and Leadership

    The
    ongoing debate raises important questions about the relationship between age
    and effective leadership. While experience is often valued in political office,
    concerns about cognitive decline and physical stamina in older candidates have
    become increasingly prominent.

    As
    the 2024 election approaches, voters are grappling with these complex issues.
    The outcome of this election may well set new precedents for how age is
    perceived and discussed in future presidential races.

    Oldest Justices and Politicians

    Name

    Age

    Current
    Role

    Major
    Accomplishments

    Clarence Thomas

    76

    16

     

    Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the
    United States

    17

    Justice
    Clarence Thomas has served on the Supreme Court since 1991, advocating for
    conservative interpretations and contributing to significant rulings such as
    *Bush v. Gore* and cases concerning Second Amendment rights. His influence
    has been notable in revisiting previous court decisions on civil rights and
    administrative power, marking him as a pivotal figure in contemporary
    judicial discourse.  18

    John G. Roberts, Jr.

    69

    19

     

    Chief Justice of the United States

    19

     

    Roberts
    has authored significant Supreme Court opinions, including the 2012 ruling
    that upheld the Affordable Care Act. He is known for his moderate
    conservative judicial philosophy and ability to navigate ideological divides,
    including key First Amendment cases. His tenure reflects an important shift
    in the Court’s ideology and he is often involved in pivotal decisions that
    impact civil rights and public policy. 19

    Samuel A. Alito, Jr.

    74

    20

     

    Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the
    United States
    21

    As an
    Associate Justice, Alito has authored significant opinions on major cases
    that reflect conservative values, such as those concerning gun rights and
    religious liberty. He has been described as a key judicial voice for
    conservatives and has shaped modern legal interpretations in multiple
    high-profile rulings. 22

    Kay Ivey

    79

    23

     

    Governor of Alabama

    24

     

    Kay
    Ivey has presided over record low unemployment at 3.5%, significant
    investments in the state’s economy totaling over $42 billion, and has led
    initiatives for infrastructure improvements and educational enhancements
    during her time as governor. 25

    Jim Justice

    72

    26

     

    Governor of West Virginia

    27

     

    Enacted
    the largest state tax cut in West Virginia history returning over $750
    million to the residents through tax cuts. Signed more pro-life legislation
    than any governor in state history and supported initiatives in school choice
    and economic diversification. 28

    Joe Biden

    81

    29

     

    46th president of the United States

    30

     

    Biden
    has passed major legislation including the American Rescue Plan ($1.9
    trillion for COVID-19 relief), the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act,
    and the Inflation Reduction Act aimed at combating climate change. His
    presidency has also been marked by historic investments in infrastructure and
    significant efforts in promoting public health and pandemic response such as
    getting over 500 million COVID-19 vaccinations distributed. He also oversaw a
    complete withdrawal from Afghanistan, ending the longest war in American
    history. 31

    Donald Trump

    78

    32

     

    45th President of the United States

    33

     

    Major
    accomplishments during Trump’s presidency include appointing three Supreme
    Court justices, implementing significant tax cuts through the Tax Cuts and
    Jobs Act, achieving record low unemployment rates for various demographic
    groups, and initiating several substantial federal regulations and reforms in
    areas such as immigration and trade policy. 34

     

  • For a More Productive Workforce, Scientific Know-How Helps – WSJ

    For a More Productive Workforce, Scientific Know-How Helps – WSJ:

    So a plant run without scientists and engineers will be 4.4% less productive. This might be for several reasons, but most likely because off efficiency. Scientists are always trying to figure out a better way to do stuff.

    It is good to have empirical evidence to support the value of scientists outside of the labs. Engineers could help improve the entire production and supply chain.

    Here is the working paper: NBER Working Paper№23484, “The Effects of Scientists and Engineers on Productivity and Earnings
    at the Establishment Where They Work,” June 2017, by Erling Barth, James C. Davis, Richard
    B. Freeman, and Andrew J. Wang.

    There’s several questions that would be interesting to know. All would require a much more careful read of the paper. Why would companies have plants that do not have scientists and engineers? These are outside of the labs where basic research is done.

    Hall & Hinkelman (2013) argue that a cross section of the organization would be use starting early in the basic research stage and going all the way through to production. This Enabling Technology Unit (ETU) team would include engineers, scientists and marketing folks. Since they would be working together, it would not make much difference if the scientist/engineer was in the lab or in the factory/plant.

    Maybe the ETU approach would offer even more efficiencies than those found by moving some scientists into the plant.

    References

    Hall, E. B. & Hinkelman, R. M. (2013). Perpetual Innovation™: A guide to strategic
    planning, patent commercialization and enduring competitive advantage, Version
    2.0
    . Morrisville, NC: LuLu Press.
    Retrieved from:
    http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/SBPlan

    ‘via Blog this’

  • Google got it wrong. The open-office trend is destroying the workplace. – The Washington Post

    Google got it wrong. The open-office trend is destroying the workplace. – The Washington Post:

    This is a great article about the “open air” cubicle farm for workers. Or “fish bowl” for employees.

    Telecommuting would help this work better. If someone has a real deadline and real work that needs to be done, they could work at home. Try to schedule meetings priority days so people who need to meet can all be on campus on specific days of the week (or month).

    Productivity will go up. Huge amounts of savings will occur for everyone, and employees will be a whole lot happier. Wait until we really hit full employment and watch the fish start to migrate to better working conditions. (Economists used to think that 6% was full employment, now 5%. Moving past full employment tends to produce wage inflation as the only available human resources can be obtained by enticing talent from a friendly competitor.)

    Teleworking might save the fishbowl, but it seems likely that the fishbowl has cracks.

    ‘via Blog this’

  • Olivier Scalabre: The next manufacturing revolution is here | TED Talk | TED.com

    Olivier Scalabre: The next manufacturing revolution is here | TED Talk | TED.com:

    Yes. It is here. The next generation of manufacturing.This is an absolutely spot on TED talk related to the world of manufacturing.

    Everyone in the USA wines and complains about the flight of manufacturing from the USA. We don’t make anything any more. That’s not really true. We still make a lot of stuff, but the percentage of the workforce that makes stuff is a much, much lower percentage.

    After 3 major industrial “revolutions” that have lasted 50-60 years each, we are due for another breakthrough technology/process/approach. It has now been about 50 years of slowing productivity. And the next revolution is already here.

    Monsieur Olivier has very profound arguments for manufacturing to return onshore. One of his arguments is mass customization that is best done near to market (onshore), especially with the latest technologies.

    There’s another massive argument that pertains to the US, and not Europe (France). With new technologies of fracking & horizontal drilling, the US is swimming in cheap oil and (nat)gas. A huge proportion of manufacturing has to do with the cost of electricity — cheap and clean(er) now with the major switches away from coal (toward NatGas and renewables). Transportation is cheap and more efficient. Plus, almost everything manufactured uses oil, particulates and natural gas. All plastics can, and should be manufactured at home.

    We have been flaring about half of the NatGas in the US. All we have to do is set up an electric plant (run electric transmission lines) and/or a plastics factory next to the oil fields to capture some of this free energy.

    Also, in 2015 and 2016, renewable energy has broken through that foggy glass floor. Without considering any of the externalities of coal, wind and solar are now cheaper for electricity. If the true costs of coal, considering all externalities are 2 to 3 times the price at the meter, then cheaper, better and cleaner energy is available at home. Far better in all respects than any factory in China or India.

    Watch the assumptions and assertions in Olivier’s presentation and see how much and how quickly it all comes to pass.
    ‘via Blog this’

  • Survive or Thrive in times of Economic Uncertainty

    Posted on August 12, 2011 by Dr. Edward F. Knab

    It doesn’t matter if they call it a recession, depression or something else, the world economies are on the brink of a double dip recession. Consumer confidence is is now at its lowest level in 50 years and companies must develop effective strategies in order to survive these challenging times.

    While there is little wrong with prudent cutting costs, the companies who emerge from economic downturns quickest and gain the most market share are those who applied innovation during the downturn to add value to their business and their customers. It is during these challenging times that companies often separate themselves from mediocrity by integrating high degrees of innovation.

    Generally, in time of economic uncertainty, the concept of innovation is not even up for discussion, whereas it should be the basis for all ‘going forward’ decisions. Traditional supply chain issues such using innovative means to get products people want to buy to them faster and cheaper is the foundation for improving the value equation we bring to the table. Our focus should be on adding value to the customer rather than cutting costs. All of our focus as innovators should be directed at “added value”; even the act of cutting cost is in reality adding value.

    Supply Chain innovators provide value to their customers by improving systems which result in improving profits. The great majority of all improvements are of an incremental nature rather than a single “big bang”, they are a result of constant and never ending improvements (CANI). Companies that can integrate some simple philosophic approaches into the customer relationships can create greater value for their customers and themselves, and will gain competitive advantage in the marketplace, especially as the economy improves.

    Listen to your Customers.
    Get to really know them, live with them, understand their opportunities and support them. Most companies will tell you they know their customers but it reality they know the statistics of what and when they buy but do not know what their customers’ problems and challenges are. Often, the answer is Supply Chain related, businesses need to be asking their customers; what worked? what didn’t? and what next? and often the result is technology-assisted collaboration which creates a foundation for a new and improved relationship. It starts with demand signals – knowing what quantities and mix of products are selling in each store or region for you, your customer, or your customer’s customer. Supply chain integration and visibility applications can be the conduit making channel collaboration possible.

    Reduce Transportation Time and Cost
    Fluctuating energy cost are an underlying cause of our current economic turbulence, with supply chains lengthening and fuel costs on a roller coaster ride, transportation costs and risks are areas that must be stabilized first. Some of the strategies that can help in the long term are network design, near-shoring, and local production and distribution. In the short term Transportation Management Systems can help reduce cost and optimize efficiency. The concept of shippers co-operatives are gaining new traction as volumes decrease and in stock inventory is a mandate. Eliminating empty miles through arranging back-hauls and continuous moves, automating yard movements and appointment scheduling, and providing portals for carrier and customer communication can significantly improve efficiency.

    Optimize Working Capital and Reduce Cost
    The economic challenges should result in a good long look in how we are leveraging out capital and help us identify area where we may improve our utilization. Cost reduction programs that mandate cost cutting percentages across all departments only reward those who ran too fat in the first place. More importantly, they are not geared to adding value to the customer. In fact, the opposite is usually true. The right way to reduce cost is to start with customer demand signals. Follow the demand signal up through the demand chain to manufacturing and suppliers, then down through distribution to the customer or the store shelf. Examine each point along this journey to see what adds value and what doesn’t. Cut everything that does not add value. That is the principle of lean supply chains.

    Streamline Processes
    Innovation requires improving processes by leveraging best practices and technology to create better flows of product, people and information. Look at order management, manufacturing and procurement, distribution and transportation. There are significant new developments in technology supporting these areas. For example, using a single system to track raw materials and purchased components, sequence them into and through production, and then tracking the combined output through distribution improves manufacturing and distribution efficiency, and has huge traceability benefits in case of recall.

    Make Good Decisions based on Good Data:
    Often ERP systems have failed to live up to their promise of integrated and assessable supply chain data and management has been hard pressed to make good decisions. Management needs real-time access to accurate, meaningful information which was supposed to be the promise of ERP. However, the batch nature of ERP and its lack of supply chain detail have shown the reality to be less than optimal. What are needed are business intelligence tools that link, sort and analyze data from all the supply chain systems and trading partners to present meaningful, personalized information to executives in real-time. This information is displayed on graphic dashboards that are easy to comprehend and act upon, yet can be used to drill down to get to the root cause of problems. The good news is these business intelligence systems are available today. They give supply chain management the tools they need to respond with agility to the ever-increasing variability of demand and take advantage of new market opportunities before the competition.

    After years of down-sizing, right-sizing and lean, most companies are already running full out. Cutting heads may cut costs, but it also cuts customer service while raising overtime expense and blood pressures. Go from survival mode to competitive advantage by empowering your employees through a performance-focused culture. Look to innovate, everywhere! It won’t all work but your organization will learn from it, they will learn that controlled failure is acceptable providing there is a plan with predefined outcomes and a method of coordination. Promote learning to insure your organization is in tune with the latest supply chain innovation in the market. Challenge the organization to get closer to the customer at every touch point; senior management, buyer/seller, AP/AR, SCM/Customer Service and others.

    If your company is attempting to cope with turbulence in your supply chain the Supply Chain Experts can help you design a program that satisfies the requirements of your customers while insuring the optimal data flows to accurately control your global supply chain.

    Dr. Edward F. Knab
    Productivity Constructs, Inc.
    800 660 8718 office
    949 413 7333 mobile
    ed@edwardknab.com
    www.productivityconstructs.com
    More Supply Chain Experts Blogs
    edwardknab.com

    Dr. Knab is an academic practitioner and seasoned supply chain expert whose company, Productivity Constructs, Inc., is focused improving global leadership and thereby creating more effective organizations and higher levels of job satisfaction. Dr. Knab can be contacted for speaking engagements, coaching, or consultation at ed@productivityconstructs.com, ed@ewardknab.com or www.edwardknab.com.