Apple Loses Patent Infringement Suit, Ordered to Pay $533 Million | Rolling Stone

Apple Loses Patent Infringement Suit, Ordered to Pay $533 Million | Rolling Stone:

It seems apropos that Rolling Stone would have a great report on the iTunes (Apple) law suit loss to the tune of 1/2 billion dollar$. The loss rules that Apple did infringe on the 6 patents related to the storing and accessing of songs, videos and games.

In the suit that might well be called the the Apple vs. the Troll, the ruling was that Apple not only infringed, but willingly did so and consequently results in the terrible treble-damages penalty that makes patents such a powerful weapon.

The other company is Smartflash. This is a non-practicing entity (NPE), that might unkindly be called a patent troll.

Apple plans to appeal. Smartflash is aiming for the iPhone and iPad sales/profits because those devices actually play iTunes music that is subject to the infringing patents.

Imagine how many billion paid downloads from iTunes it takes to make up a $0.5B to pay the fine.? WoW.

This could get uglier and uglier.

‘via Blog this’

Similar Posts

  • | |

    39 Most Tantalizing Business Cards

    39 Most Tantalizing Business Cards: Some really cool (and a couple rather obnoxious/risque) business card concepts. Thinking of being innovative??? How about this. Come up with a cool design patent. Then come up with a way to represent that design on a business card. Then come up with a design patent on the business card….

  • No PTA For Divisional Application… Term Adjustments.. 20 years +/-

    No PTA For Divisional Application | PharmaPatents: When does a 20 year patent turn out to be more than a 20 year patent… Patent Term Adjustments. Okay, so under certain situations, an extension can be requested to the 20 years that the US has for patent applications after 1995. The idea is that for such…

  • | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Linear Economy vs Circular Economy: Why Solvency Matters

    Modern economies are often evaluated by growth, productivity, and short-term profitability. Yet these metrics can obscure a more fundamental question: Is the system solvent when all costs are counted? The distinction between a linear economy and a circular economy is not primarily an environmental debate—it is an accounting one. Linear systems extract resources, convert them…

  • | | | | | | | | | | | | |

    Unsustainability as the Engine of Sustainability and Scenario Planning

    Sustainability and scenario planning Synergy. Sustainability and scenario planning may seem like two separate domains—one focused on resource stewardship and long-term resilience, the other on mapping uncertainties and preparing for multiple futures. Yet they are deeply intertwined. Anything that is not sustainable will eventually fail, and in that failure lies the seed of future scenarios….

  • | |

    Scenario Planning when the Official View of the Future is Uncertain

    What we can learn today from Y2K. Scenario Planning and Contingency Planning are needed now, more than ever.

  • | |

    USA: An Overconsumer

    Despite comprising just 4.3% of the global population, the U.S. accounts for a staggering 32% of worldwide personal consumption. This statistic highlights the significant economic weight of American consumers, who drive demand both at home and abroad. However, it also underscores a profound social responsibility: as a dominant force in global consumption, U.S. consumers have…