| | | |

Vringo Requests Court to Increase Royalty against Google + AOL

Vringo Requests Court to Increase Royalty Rate to Be Paid by Google, AOL | Fox Business: “Vringo Requests Court to Increase Royalty “

Ouch. The royalty rates on AdWords by Google & ads by AOL could really get expensive.

Google has kept a competitive advantage because of their bid-to-ad technology. That’s where they have historically made most of their money.

The computation formula would be based on 20.9% of Googles adword revenue as the base. And 3.5% of that… That is only 0.7315%. So less than 1% of Google’s AdWords. Still lots of millions.

This looks like it will start to get expensive for them and AOL to keep using the technology owned by Vringo. Huge winnings already in place but aiming for a 7% royalty going forward.

Wow. This could get to be interesting.

Keywords: patent, Vringo, Google, AOL, AdWord, willful, infringe, court

‘via Blog this’

Similar Posts

  • | |

    Disruptive Innovation: Why AI Will Spark Exponential Economic Growth

     The innovation and investment guru Cathy Wood gave a TED talk in December 2023 about 5 pivotal innovation platforms that will (continue) to change the world as we know it. Her group expects to see exponential sustained growth that is fueled by the productivity gains in these areas, especially where they converge. The 5 platforms (AI, Robotics, Energy Storage, DNA sequencing, and blockchain) are described below, with AI in the center. One example she uses…

  • PWC, What you get when there's too much Booz in the baby naming process.

    I fear that PWC was boozing it up a little too much when the rebranded their subsidiary to be now called: “Strategy &“.  And what, you ask?Booz & Co is a buyout subsidiary of Price Waterhouse Cooper (PWC), the large accounting/consulting firm. It seems only right that the division with the boozy name should be revamped as something else, Right? But, in a drunken stupor, they couldn’t really come up with what the division will…

  • | | | |

    Lululemon vs. Costco: Law Suit Over “Dupes,” Design Patent, and IP Integrity

    The Spandex War. Lululemon Athletica has filed a high-profile intellectual property lawsuit against Costco Wholesale Corporation, claiming that the retail giant’s Kirkland Signature line and other in-store apparel offerings include “knockoffs” or “dupes” of Lululemon’s signature designs. This case pits a premium athletic wear innovator against a cost-conscious retailer—and could shape the future of fashion-focused IP enforcement. Spandex War: Trade Dress, Design Patents, and Trademarks in Focus You might think of this as the Spandex…

  • No PTA For Divisional Application… Term Adjustments.. 20 years +/-

    No PTA For Divisional Application | PharmaPatents: When does a 20 year patent turn out to be more than a 20 year patent… Patent Term Adjustments. Okay, so under certain situations, an extension can be requested to the 20 years that the US has for patent applications after 1995. The idea is that for such applications as pharma the long lead time in all approvals through the PTO and the FDA and more… can significantly…

  • | | | | | |

    Better Ways: A Gentle Nudge Toward Sustainability

    Our modern lifestyle—from single‑use plastics to daily commutes—has proven unsustainable. But sustainability doesn’t mean sacrifice. Small, smart changes—like energy efficiency, telecommuting, and reusable products—can save money, reduce stress, and improve life quality. Even if you’re not perfect, every better choice counts. Just a Little More Sustainability in Everything We Do Let’s be honest—we’ve built a world that doesn’t quite work for the long haul. From single-use everything to commutes that eat up our day (and…

  • | | | |

    Intellectual Property Counterfeiting- more than an Ownership Problem

    IP counterfeiting doesn’t get alot of press these days and hasn’t for decades, but, this article definitely needs reading.  Here is the link:IP Counterfeiting Yet another in a growing list of situations in which crime appears to pay- or, it is clearly worth the risks involved.IP owners have another aspect of commercialization that must be continually addressed on a corporate level.