Category: carbon footprint

  • Solar with Batteries vs. Generator: A Cost-Benefit Analysis

    In
    the realm of backup power solutions, homeowners and businesses often find
    themselves choosing between traditional generators and modern solar systems
    with battery backup. While both options provide energy security during outages,
    their long-term costs and benefits differ significantly. In this case we are looking at a larger, whole-home sized generator and comparing it to a solar system that produces as much or more power. See table below for comparison of costs, savings and benefits.

    Sunk Cost vs Investment

    Note that the
    generator is a sunk cost, basically designed as insurance for power outages. It
    can avoid food loss from refrigerators/ freezers, operate emergency appliances,
    and maintain comfort. The best situation is if the power never goes out, and
    the generator is never used (except for required maintenance).

    The solar+battery
    investment assumes Net Metering with the power company. All the power produced
    is used directly or transferred out to the power grid. The savings, in this
    case, is $150 per month of locally produced solar power making this an
    excellent investment for a homeowner (especially with the 30% Federal renewable
    energy tax credit). It is a crazy profitable investment for a business because
    they also get the benefits of depreciation which reduces their income (and
    therefore provides a tax “shield”).

    Oh, and
    solar+battery provides an uninterruptible battery backup solution for outages.
    Think of the UPS that you hook computers and sensitive equipment to in the
    office.

    Initial Investment

    A typical
    whole-home generator costs around $20,000 installed, offering immediate
    backup power during outages

    In contrast, a
    solar system with battery backup may require a higher initial investment of
    about $35,000, before tax benefits.

    However, this
    upfront cost difference doesn’t tell the whole story.

    Long-Term Financial Impact

    Generator Costs

    Over a 20-year
    lifespan, a whole-home generator’s total cost, including fuel and maintenance, can reach
    approximately $32,138 in net present value

    This calculation
    factors in weekly test runs, monthly usage for backup, and annual maintenance
    costs.

    Solar System Benefits

    A solar system
    with battery backup, while more expensive initially, offers significant
    long-term savings:

    • Electricity
      Bill Reduction
      :
      The system can potentially save $1,800 annually in electricity costs, with
      savings increasing as energy prices rise
    • Tax
      Incentives
      :
      A 30% federal investment tax credit substantially reduces the initial cost
    • Return
      on Investment
      :
      Over 25 years, the system could generate a total savings of $66,821,
      resulting in a 172.74% ROI

    Business Advantages

    For businesses,
    particularly incorporated farms, the financial benefits of solar are even more
    pronounced:

    • Accelerated
      Depreciation
      :
      Using Section 179 depreciation, businesses can deduct 85% of the system’s
      cost in the first year
    • Enhanced
      ROI
      :
      With tax benefits, the effective cost drops to $16,170, boosting the ROI
      to an impressive 313.24% over 25 years

    Environmental Impact

    Solar systems
    offer the added benefit of reducing carbon footprint, aligning with growing
    environmental concerns and potentially improving corporate image.

    Conclusion

    While generators
    provide reliable backup power with a lower initial cost, solar systems with
    battery backup offer superior long-term financial benefits and environmental
    advantages. For homeowners, the choice may depend on immediate budget
    constraints versus long-term savings. For businesses, especially those able to
    leverage tax benefits, solar presents a compelling financial case, combining
    energy independence with significant cost savings over time.


     Comparison of Major Factors in Whole Home Generator vs Solar+Battery

    Factor

    Whole-Home
    Generator

    Solar System
    w/Battery Backup

    Initial Cost

    $20,000
    installed

    $35,000
    installed

    Net Cost After
    Incentives

    $20,000

    $24,500
    (homeowner*),
    $16,170 (business)

    Lifespan

    20 years

    25 years

    Net Present
    Value (NPV)

    -$32,138

    +$42,321
    (homeowner*),
    +$50,651 (business)

    Return on Investment
    (ROI)

    N/A (cost only)

    172.74%
    (homeowner*),
    313.24% (business)

    Annual Operating
    Costs

    $974 (fuel +
    maintenance)

    Minimal

    Energy Bill
    Savings

    None

    $1,800 in first
    year, increases yearly

    Payback Period

    N/A

    ~11-12 years
    (homeowner*),
    ~9 years (business)

    Environmental
    Impact

    Produces
    emissions

    Clean energy,
    reduces carbon footprint

    Maintenance
    Requirements

    Regular
    maintenance needed

    Minimal
    maintenance

    Fuel Dependent

    Relies on
    natural gas or propane

    No fuel required

    Tax Incentives

    None

    30% federal tax
    credit, depreciation benefits for businesses

    Power
    Availability

    Daily energy
    production with backup capacity

    Daily energy
    production with backup capacity

    Scalability

    Limited

    Expandable (add
    panels or batteries)

    Lag-time when
    power drops

    Almost
    instantaneous

    Several seconds,
    up to 30 seconds

    * There is a 30% tax refund
    or “rebated” for most nonprofits. Nonprofits would generally have the same
    advantages and ROI as the homeowner. See IRS.gov for qualifying orgs.


  • Update to Sustainability WikiBook (Using the power of Generative AI)

    It’s been a while since the Perpetual Sustainability(tm) wikibook has been updated. The idea behind the book was that people could link through on each sustainability-related topic and find up-to-date information on the topic as only Wikipedia can provide — the genius of crowdsourcing. We let ChatGPT 4.0 work on an update (and the graphic). What do you think?

    YOU Q:
    Please generate an outline improved from the one attached that includes
    hyperlinks to each topic. Where appropriate include links to quality Wikipedia
    articles. Also, please u
    tilize
    the WikiBook outline with Wikipedia hyper links by Hall from:
    https://perpetualinnovation.org/p/sust-wikibook-links.html

    Sustainability
    WikiBook Outline

    Introduction

    Earth Systems & Climate Change

    The Carbon Cycle

    Hydrocarbons & Fossil Fuels

    Energy, Water, and Resources Nexus

    Carbon Emissions and Management

    Sustainable Solutions

    References and Further Reading

     

    YOU: Q: Please
    create a graphic book cover as well.

     

    YOU
    Q:

    Generate a reference and reading list. format the references in APA format.

  • EV v ICE, What’s the Price?

    EV v ICE, What’s the Price?

     Every couple months something pops into my news feed or email about how bad or expensive Electric Vehicles (EVs) are compared to the olde Internal Combustion Engine (ICE machines).  (See cartoon from Yale Climate Connection Don’t be fooled: Electric vehicles really are better for the climate.)

    One that popped up was from a very biased web site (can’t call it a magazine or journal). The cost for EVs to operate were $17 per gallon, equivalent. It relied on an actual study, and then changed out all the facts.

    First, it assumed that you only charge away from home, never at home where it’s much cheaper. Some 99% of EVs are charged at home or (free? at the office) almost all the time. By this assumption, it would assume that the home did not use solar panels which would make the home charging costs even cheaper. Then, they added in all possible externalities for EVs including government subsidies. Wah-la, the magical cost per gallon for EVs is 5 to 8 times ICE machines. (non-news site intentionally not cited)

    Why then, wouldn’t the ICE machine side of the equation include government subsidies to oil and gas. Several studies show that coal, oil & gas get at least $1T in subsidies every year, and the equivalent of about $15T including indirect subsidies and extenalities. 

    If you really want to know the comparison between EVs & ICE vehicles, look at  SkepticalScience: https://skepticalscience.com/evs-really-better-climate.html  … they provide some of the best sources and best analysis. Because of the cost of production (an EV can weigh twice an ICE because of the batteries), it takes about 22 months before breakeven — emissions-wise. But after that the emissions are massively less for the EV. Figure about $1 per gallon equivalent.

    If you want to do an analysis of an EV and an ICE machine, consider how you will use the vehicle and check out these sources. 

    Total Cost of Ownership is a big question as well. The raw materials to make each type of car, where it is made, shipping, etc. There are a few sources that work on this. (Sites/sources on lifetime costs tend to be overly simplified or overly complicated.)

    Dealers don’t like EVs because there’s not really any maintenance. No urgent need to see the customer every 6 months to 1 year. No oil to change, no belts to replace. Only fill the windshield washer tank. The brakes have low usage because of regenerative power is used to slow the vehicle by generating power back to the batteries. The dealers will continue to lose touch with their customers, and the trade-in that comes with it.

    But the big reason for going EV is making a conscious and continuous effort to move away from fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are not sustainable. The air pollution from burning coal, oil and gas causes health issues and premature deaths of millions of people worldwide every year.  To move toward sustainable solutions, we have to move away from those that aren’t. 

    Two points that often come up is: 1) Renewable Energy (RE); and, 2) electric mix for the power grid and sources of materials like lithium & cobalt for EV. Renewable energy is growing at crazy rates and it is consistently far cheaper (even with battery augmentation) than coal, oil or nuclear. Battery technology (and such) will continue to improve, much like computer chips and hard drives. Products continue to be built with full life cycle designs so the materials in EVs will (soon) be completely recycled. 

    We need to electrify everything to reduce pollution and greenhouse gases. It took 120 years to build a world economy powered by coal, oil, gas, nuclear and hydro. Over time we need to completely replace fossil fuels. Many people thought we could simply wait until we started to exhaust the (readily available) supplies of fossil fuels and high prices would recalibrate the economy toward more sustainable methods of power and transportation. Waiting another 20, or even 5 years, to act is no longer an option.

    #EV #BreakingTheICE #Renewables #RE100 #CarbonEmmissions #CarbonFootprint

  • Solar Investment is Crazy Profitable for Businesses and Good for Homeowners

    [Update. The Inflation Reduction Act 2022 has raised and extended the 30% investment tax credit to qualified investments. There are many limitations and additions. See our Blog post here. This makes all the financial discussions below much more profitable. Also, higher inflation and higher power inflation. The below Article was originally published in Summer of 2020.]
     
    SBP has done several detailed financial calculators for analyzing both residential and commercials solar projects. SustainZine has a main web page on Solar Profitability where
    we discuss examples from our Solar Profitability Calculators: https://www.sustainzine.com/p/solarinvest.html
    Here are articles – and YouTube videos – discussing
    both:
    1. Quick Take on 
      Residential Solar
      Solar
      Invest 2020: Do Good and Save Money Too
      … See the video related to
      Residential here:
      Solar Residential: Good Investment & Doing Good
    2. Full Financial AnalysisSolarInvest2020:
      Residential Solar is Good, but Commercial Solar can be Crazy Profitable!

      See the video related to Commercial/Business here:
      Solar for a Business can be Crazy Profitable: Do
      Good by Doing Well
    YouTube Video on Residential: Solar Residential: Good Investment & Doing Good https://youtu.be/p0pqg4ZeTjY
    Dr Elmer Hall talks about the doing good and making money at
    residential Solar. He discusses that subtilties of the financial analysis for a
    homeowner, and why it typically is a far better decision than a typical profit
    analysis would suggest. #SustainZine #Solar #RenewableEnergy #SBPLan
    YouTube Video on Commercial Business: Solar for a
    Business can be Crazy Profitable: Do Good by Doing Well 
    https://youtu.be/ulryBkhsKWg

    Dr Elmer Hall talks
    about the doing good and making money by a business installing Solar. He
    discusses the financial analysis for a business and why it probably is such a
    great investment. The investment for businesses has huge tax savings. Plus, the
    money to pay for power to operate the business is already committed if the
    building is used. This is Part 2: See part 1 related to Residential as well.
    #SustainZine #Solar #RenewableEnergy #SBPLan #Profitability #CrazyProfitable 

  • Earth Day 2020, 50 years of Hind sight

    It is the 50th Earth Day and the world is generally locked down while we deal with the Coronavirus pandemic — and how best to ramp back up the world economy.

    50th Earth Day. April 22 2020

    The pandemic is a serious and sobering aspect to the fun and excitement to an otherwise interesting and informative day of rallies, speeches waterway cleanups and more…

    Worldwide we are going on 3M positive COVID19 cases and nearing 200,000 deaths. The US, never to be outdone in anything that seems competitive, has 32% of the cases and more than 25% of the deaths. Deaths in New York and New Jersey just passed 15,000 and 5,000 respectively. New England deaths exceed all other countries. It is hard to imagine this given that the virus had to cross the Pacific (to the west coast) or travel to Europe and then cross the pond to New England. The US has only 4.2% of the world’s population, yet 25% of the worlds deaths, and rising. How can that be?

    COVID19 Positive Cases and Deaths

               As of April 22, 2020
           Cases  %/World
    World 2,621,436 100.0%
     deaths 182,989 7.0%
    7.0%   %/World
    US 837,719 32.0%
     deaths 46,771 25.6%
    Deaths% 5.6%

    COVID has had a big toll on health and live and a wicked toll on the world’s economies. There some linings, and some of them silver, from this
    pandemic – currently and on the other side of it. Let’s think of a couple while
    we address what the other side of COVID might look like. First, if you think
    that we will ever get back to “normal”, you probably haven’t thought it through
    a lot.

    Pollution. The massive slowdown in the world economy has
    allowed the earth to take a breather. There are wonderful satellite views of
    China, Europe and the US, before and after pictures. Business as usual shows
    clouds of pollution followed by a few weeks of complete economic shutdown, and
    pristine-looking skies. Wow! There are similar pictures everywhere. Denver. LA, New York. The clear
    canals of Venice with fish and dolphin. 
    Pollution contributes to hundreds of millions of ailments every year, and to millions and millions of deaths. Let’s say 6 to 10 million people die each year because of air pollution. (See for example, this Forbes article in 2018.) Note that the infographic shows about 2.1M in the USA. Maybe the slowdown in the first quarter of 2020 will result in 1M people saved related to air pollution? 
    Once people get a taste of clean air, they tend not to want to return to smog and pollution.
    A Whole New Economy. The world economy will never be the same. For several reasons. First, what we came to think of as “normal” was never normal. We have undertaken to consume all the world’s fossil fuels in a few short centuries. We are fully beginning to realize the full costs of non-sustainable systems, the business-as-usual economy was never normal.
    Earth Overshoot day is a concept that is especially relevant to the first Earth Day in 1970. The resources we took and consumed from the earth — although maybe not sustainable and renewable — were fully supplied by the 1 planet we inhabit. That is, the 3.7B world population in 1970, staying with the same consumption patters, could live on the earth without depleting her resources. Think of this earth carrying capacity like you do a annual budget, it would be nice if the annual income lasted all year. But the population has more than doubled to 7.7B, and overall consumption has nearly doubled. Right now, the carrying capacity of Earth is exhausted about the end of July, only 57% of the way through the year! That’s 43% deficit spending for the rest of the year. To consume 43% more than the earth’s annual carrying capacity, we deplete resources like trees, fish and more.
    But, in 2020, the earth has gotten a bit of a breather. Overshoot day will improve dramatically!
    The economy will change. There will never be a “new normal”. People have gotten a taste of teleworking. It’s going to be hard to force people back into the offices that require an hour commute each way. Travel will take some time to come back, and business travel will never be the same. Stadium events will take some time to come back. Students have fully embraced online learning, and they will never fully go back.
    Consumption of fossil fuels are down at least 30% during the closed economy, but consumption may only bounce back half when the economy slowly starts to churn back.
    This might be the jump start that we all needed to step up a move toward sustainability. Assuming a 15% jump back, we would need to reduce our carbon footprint by 3% each and every year to have a 40% (overall) reduction by 2030, a 66% reduction by 2040, and near zero by 2050. Good news, we can easily move to 100% renewables by that time. (See Stanford Roadmap to 100% Renewable Energy by 2050 by country and also by major city.) And we can profitably move to 100% renewables if we include the health and death costs of fossil fuels.
    Hind sight is 2020. Every year since the turn of century as been in the hottest 20 some years, with many years breaking all time records. In fact, many months have hit monthly record highs, especially since 2015 (an El Nino year). January 2020 was hottest on record, and the oceans have never been hotter. Remember that carbon dioxide (CO2) persists in the environment for about 100 years from the time we introduce it by burning fossil fuels. As CO2 zooms from about 320ppm a hundred years ago to 415ppm now, the green house gasses will result in atmospheric heating for a century!
    Our linear economy was never “normal”, for this reason, and many others no one should consider using the term “new normal” on the other side of the COVID recession. Hopefully, with 2020, we will have a new respect for science and scientists.
    Let’s leverage this tragedy of COVID to make a real difference in our trajectory of the future.
    May every day be an Earth Day.