Category: Energy efficiency

  • Update to Sustainability WikiBook (Using the power of Generative AI)

    It’s been a while since the Perpetual Sustainability(tm) wikibook has been updated. The idea behind the book was that people could link through on each sustainability-related topic and find up-to-date information on the topic as only Wikipedia can provide — the genius of crowdsourcing. We let ChatGPT 4.0 work on an update (and the graphic). What do you think?

    YOU Q:
    Please generate an outline improved from the one attached that includes
    hyperlinks to each topic. Where appropriate include links to quality Wikipedia
    articles. Also, please u
    tilize
    the WikiBook outline with Wikipedia hyper links by Hall from:
    https://perpetualinnovation.org/p/sust-wikibook-links.html

    Sustainability
    WikiBook Outline

    Introduction

    Earth Systems & Climate Change

    The Carbon Cycle

    Hydrocarbons & Fossil Fuels

    Energy, Water, and Resources Nexus

    Carbon Emissions and Management

    Sustainable Solutions

    References and Further Reading

     

    YOU: Q: Please
    create a graphic book cover as well.

     

    YOU
    Q:

    Generate a reference and reading list. format the references in APA format.

  • SolarInvest2020: Residential Quick Take on Doing Good

    Residential Solar can be a good investment. Good Savings.
     
    [UPDATE: 30% Investment Tax Credit on renewables in the IRA Act. See our Blog post here. This makes all the financial discussions below much more profitable. Also, higher inflation and higher power inflation.]
    Anyone thinking of putting solar on a residential property will obviously
    be friendly to doing a good deed for the environment, but would also like to
    understand the financial implications. There are subtleties to the analysis
    that are critical to appreciate the full benefits of setting up a solar power
    system to replace your residential utility power. We have become accustomed to
    renting power as a way of life. There’s a paradigm shift needed to appreciate
    owning your own power system and saving on a monthly power bill. Hall has a
    detailed article
    Residential Solar is
    Good, but Commercial Solar can be Crazy Profitable!
    that you will want to
    read as you think further about the financial analysis for a specific solar
    project, especially a business project. Here are the key points for a
    residential solar system.
    Profitable. Solar can be profitable for a
    homeowner to purchase, but there are additional considerations that usually
    make the decision even better than it might appear at first glance.
    Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC). The ITC reduces
    income taxes by 26% of the system price, so you only pay 84% of the price of
    the system. This ITC goes down to zero (0%) by 2022.
    Easy Loan Option. A homeowner will usually have
    several loan options available, including using a home equity line of credit
    (HELOC) or financing affiliated with the solar company. (Lease options are also
    available from some installers, and may be a good option for a homeowner with
    lower credit and low house equity.)
    Positive Cash Flows. Household budget should be
    cash positive compared to power bills. Frequently, loan options include
    interest-only for a year until the ITC is realized (and applied to the loan).
    What would have gone to the IRS in taxes is applied to the solar system, and
    what would have gone to the power company goes to pay off the loan for the
    power system you own.
    Annual Return. The savings each year could
    easily be 7% return each year on the net investment.
    Avoid Utility Power Price Increases. If the
    power company increased rates by 1% (or 2%) a year, the real savings from the
    solar system could be 8% (or 9%).
    Sunk Operating Costs. This is not a normal
    financial analysis, so different perspective is helpful. If the residence is
    being used, then the electricity to operate it is needed. The money is already
    being committed to rent a little bit of the power plant from the utility power
    indefinitely. Or, you could buy your own power system. You could pay less in
    loan payments than what the power bill would have been and then have free power
    for decades thereafter. Committed, or sunk operating costs, is one aspect of
    the buy-solar decision that takes a little perspective adjustment to fully appreciate,
    but savings is another.

    After-tax Savings. After-tax savings is a
    beautiful thing, especially if it is recurring every month. You pay the power
    bill in after-tax dollars. So every dollar saved on your budget for electricity
    is better than a dollar increase in your salary. Consider a 30% marginal income
    tax level. (Marginal tax rate is on the next $1 of income or savings, not the average
    income which have no taxes at the lowest levels.) At 30% marginal tax rate, you
    would need $1.30 to have an extra $1 to spend on your power bill if power costs
    went up next year by $1. There are other deductions, plus your employer has expenses
    and deductions, so costs to your employer would be $1.50 or more for you to
    have an extra $1 raise for your power bill, which would leave you with the same
    discretionary income as the past year. Savings related to power is pure
    discretionary income, spend it anywhere you want… You just got a raise!
    Net Metered. The usual way to go solar on
    residential is to connect to the utility power with net metering, a measured
    meter that takes your solar power as you produce it and gives you back the
    power when you need it. If you over produce at the end of the year, the power
    company typically rebates you – but usually at a rather paltry rate – for your
    extra power. Therefore, you would typically size the system to your
    (anticipated) needs, and not much more.
    Batteries. If you want to have your own power
    when the grid is down, you will want to get batteries. Battery prices and
    technology, like the Tesla PowerWall, is really starting to hit critical mass.
    Batteries can also be eligible for the 26% investment tax credit.
    Solar System is an Asset. The basic accounting
    for a solar paid for by a loan might look like this. Buy a $30,000 solar system
    (an asset) by borrowing $30,000 on your HELOC (a loan). If you didn’t think the
    system was worth $30,000 (because of the power it produces for decades), you
    probably wouldn’t have bought it. But, you get an investment tax credit of 26%
    in 2020 so the actual system cost (after eliminated income taxes of $7,800) is
    only $22,200. You can go on vacation with the $7,800 or apply it to the loan.
    However, this is a performing asset that produces power for decades, long after
    the loan is paid.
    What if You Sell the Home? With the home
    producing its own electricity, the operating costs are reduced by the power
    savings. The money that would have gone to the power company can now easy be
    applied to the purchase price of the home (and to a mortgage). The value of the
    house goes up, typically by the net cost of the solar system or more. Even when
    the solar loan is paid off, the value to property is the ongoing power savings
    being produced (maybe 10 to 20 times the annual power savings).
    What if You Rent the House? Renting the house
    is rather simple, simply include the value of the utility power in the rent.
    The renter should have been budgeting monthly operations (as should you in
    considering a tenant), so the money for power would be shifted into rent. The
    portion of rent associated with power might be lower than what the power bill
    would have been, and electric cost from the solar system might be fixed without
    matching the price increases that would have occurred from the utility.
    Win-win.
    Environmental Savings. The environmental
    savings are tied to the utility power you are replacing. Check your energy mix
    from your favorite (only) power utility. US-wide the 2019 electric mix was
    NatGas (38.4%), Coal (23.5%), nuclear (19.7%), hydro/thermal (6.6%) and wind
    7.3%. Solar was up from 1.8% to 2.6% of electricity power by the end of 2019. Fossil
    fuels produce huge pollution and greenhouse gases. Probably as important is the
    massive amounts of water used in operating fossil fuel and nuclear power plants.
    Doing Good. Most of the people who have gone
    solar did so for altruistic reasons, they simply wanted to be kinder to the
    planet and do their part to make things better. Lucky for us now, the
    technology has gotten much better and the prices have dropped to the point that
    solar is simply a good financial decision as well. Now we can do financially well
    by doing good.

    Strategic Business Planning Company website: SBPlan.com Blog: SustainZine.com

  • SolarInvest2020: Solar Profitability Calculations: Residential and Commercial

    As people hunker down at home, and spend time doing all those fix-up items that have been waiting for years, they should also consider working through the details of adding solar.
    First, of course, do those energy efficiency tricks that cost very little: smart thermostats, caulk windows and cracks, and improve your insulation. Your favorite power company will do an energy audit so you can get a check list of things to do. The typical building can save 15% to 25% on simple and cheap energy savings. Monitor usage, because the biggest culprit may be humans with bad energy usage habits. Insulation in the attic could have a 3 to 4 year payback and reduce your electric bill by 15 to 25%. Now with the lower energy usage, you should consider adding Solar.

    [UPDATE: 30% Investment Tax Credit on renewables in the IRA Act 2022. See our Blog post here. This makes all the financial discussions below much more profitable. Also, higher inflation and higher power inflation.]
    Solar can be a Good investment in many cases, like Residential. But it can be a Crazy Profitable investment for Businesses. The renewable investment tax credits (ITCs) drop down again at the end of 2020, so now is a great time to think about it.* 

    Residential Solar

    SBP has done several detailed financial calculators for analyzing both residential and commercials solar projects. Here are articles discussing both:

    1. Quick Take on  Residential Solar: Solar Invest 2020: Do Good and Save Money Too
    2. Full Financial Analysis: SolarInvest2020: Residential Solar is Good, but Commercial Solar can be Crazy Profitable!
    Commercial Solar
    Commercial

    Every situation is a little (or a lot) different. A solar system is specifically designed for the building and the location (average sun hours, etc.). As discussed in the second article, not all systems and warranties are created equal.

    About BizMan (Elmer Hall) & Strategic Business Planning Company. Elmer Hall has a Doctorate in International Business Administration and is an adjunct Professor of Business. He is President of Strategic Business Planning Company, a company that does business plans, especially plans that focus on intellectual property and sustainability. Look for Hall’s Perpetual Innovation™ line of books for innovators and inventors. Website: SBPlan.com Blog: SustainZine.com

    * Update: As of January 2021 the ITC has been extended at 26% for 2021 and 2022. See Discussion at SEIA.
    [UPDATE: 30% Investment Tax Credit on renewables in the IRA Act 2022. See our Blog post here. This makes all the financial discussions below much more profitable. Also, higher inflation and higher power inflation.]

  • Solar 2020 and Sustainability: Looking for the Silver Lining

    Kelly Pickerel, Editor in Chief of Solar Power World
    magazine was cautiously optimistic in January when discussing the impact of US
    Import tariffs on the Solar industry and still solar installations were up 14%
    during 2019. She hoped that an even year, 2020, would bode well for solar.
    She concluded her opening letter by the editor in the January
    2020 Trends in Solar
    edition of SPW: “Superstitious or not, I’m crossing my
    fingers for a calm, prosperous year in solar. Knock on wood.”
    Wow! Nobody could have envisioned the coronavirus pandemic
    and its impact on all industries including solar. But, the environment is
    taking a breather: Environment
    Wins with Reduced Human Activity
    .
    During the Great Recession, Hall (2010) argued that a
    massive opportunity was lost by not by not focusing on sustainability related
    projects and human capital (education). He argued for spending more on specific
    infrastructure: especially energy efficiency and renewables. He liked projects
    that would pay back for decades while reducing our collective human footprint. Federal
    bailout funding should target, long-term, sustainable projects. The destructive
    innovation associated with recessions should allow industries (and companies)
    to fail if they are not sustainable.
    Make no doubt about it, the COVID Recession will be unlike
    anything we have ever seen before. It’s like putting parts of the economy in a
    self-induced coma, while waiting out the passage of the virus. However, waking
    up exactly where we left off is probably not going to happen. So, what’s the
    best way to move forward, and why not try to leverage this sudden break in the
    world’s business-as-usual routine into more permanent action on becoming more
    sustainable.
    Look for SustainZine blogs and articles on video meetings,
    teleschool, online university and telecommuting. We suddenly have reduced our
    carbon footprint worldwide by what, 20%. Not the way we would have liked to
    launch such a massive initiative, but let’s work with the deflection we are
    given.
    People are now at home more than ever, let’s get them to
    start monitoring their carbon footprint. How much are they saving by working,
    schooling and entertaining at home. Imagine someone reducing their carbon
    footprint by 35% in one week? for several weeks? Wouldn’t it be nice measure
    that savings and celebrate the win!? Wouldn’t it be nice to keep measuring the
    reduction in carbon footprint and continue to make incremental moves?
    The savings associated with remote work are huge. Once
    workers who can work remotely get the chance to do so, the genie will be out of
    the bottle. The savings are massive: employer, employee and environment. The
    reduction in carbon footprint immense. Measuring and monitoring the savings
    will justify the future workforce to frequently work remotely.
    For the homeowner, first would be energy efficiency, like
    insulation. Start with an energy audit.
    Then, with the reduced power usage, most homes should move
    to renewable energy (solar).
    Once we see and visualize the gains, it could become habit
    forming. Let’s keep our collective fingers crossed.
    See upcoming articles by Hall about the crazy profitable
    proposition for businesses to go solar, and for homeowners to feel good and
    save money by going solar.
    Mother Earth is our one and only habitable planet. It’s time
    we started taking better care of her. Maybe the coronavirus pandemic will be a
    wake-up call about how serious we all need to be about the health of our planet?
    References
    Hall, E. (2010). Lessons of
    recessions: Sustainability education and jobs may be the answer. Journal of Sustainability and Green
    Management
    . Jacksonville, FL: Academic and Business Research Institute.
    Retrieved from: http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/10659.pdf

  • Solar Fit 052618 by flaglerbroadcasting Elmer Hall with Bill Gallagher EE & Telework

    Solar Fit 052618 by flaglerbroadcasting | Free Listening on SoundCloud:

    Folks,

    Give a listen to my May 26th appearance on the Solar-Fit radio show with host Bill Gallagher, “Solar Fit Renewable Energy Show” on channel 106.3 FM WNZF News Radio. (Elmer Hall on 05/26/18). You can also find the show, and past shows, archived at Solar-Fit:  https://solar-fit.com/solar-fit-renewable-energy-show/
    It is a fun and informative show. I talked about our collective missed opportunities in energy efficiencies (EE) in buildings and telecommuting (Sustainable Remote Work centers). I like the idea of Negawatt, the Watt of electricity that is never used, so it is never produced. A similar idea is the Negagallon of gas, the gallon of gas never used because you avoided driving (like telecommuting).
    There are surprisingly huge savings from both building efficiencies (Negawatts) and teleworking (Negagallons).  These are both win-win-win ideas that Bob Hinkelman – a partner and coauthor (2017, 2018) – and I have worked on and have amazing potential.
    • EE in buildings. Our estimates are that the savings from energy efficiency in buildings
      could save about $300B in the US each year with the “change in your pocket” (things like programable thermostats, LEDs, smart meters, caulk and duct tape), i.e., stuff that has a payback immediately or within one year. (See Alliance to Save Energy for great tips.) For new construction, a greener building can have 80% lower operating costs and be healthier, while costing within 10% of more traditional construction costs.
      EE TIP. Do an energy audit – usually provided by your local power company (frequently for free) – to evaluate current usage and best places
      to start conserving energy.
      EE TIP2. First take your energy use down through energy efficiency, thereby reducing dramatically the energy requirements when evaluating the next steps toward a zero-carbon footprint like solar, wind and geothermal.
    • Remote Work Center for telework. At Strategic Business Planning Company, we have done a lot of work related to the concept of telecommuting and providing workers the easy ability to work from home or from a work-center that is very close to home. Based on Lister and Harnish
      numbers from 2010, we estimate the total savings from just 10% of the commuters who drive along to teleworking would result in about $357B in savings per year (113M x 10% = 11.3M * $31,600 = $357B).  In 3 years, that would be more than $1.1T in savings. Or, with 30% of the drive-alones switching to telecommuting, that would be $1.1T in savings each, and every, year. That is a perpetuity of savings. (At 5% interest, a perpetuity of $1.1T represents $21.4T net
      present value terms ­– more than the entire annual US Gross Domestic Product in 2018.)
      Telework  TIP. Selectively pilot teleworking from home and log the time, distance, and productivity.
    In both building EE and telework, it is important to monitor and measure result. It is especially important to monitor the many benefits of the Negawatt and the Negagallon that don’t immediately show up in dollar savings. Allocating the financial savings is a nice way to fully enjoy the direct savings as well.
    • Smart Savings and disposable Income. Savings of energy, say $100, is worth much more than the equivalent of income. An individual would need 30% to 50% more in salary (say $130 in gross income or $150 dollars for the employer) to equate to the same amount of disposable income. For a business with 10% net income, it would require about $1,000 increase in sales to equate to $100 increase in disposable cash. This is a perpetuity of savings (or a commitment to the increased sales indefinitely).
      $TIP. Log the results and put the savings into a separate account or fund. The $100 per month that would have gone to utilities could, for example, be automatically posted to an IRA account, potentially amplifying it by your tax rate. Or, use the savings to help pay for a Solar PV system.
      $TIP2. The 30% Federal Tax credit for energy efficiency for individuals makes the investment in new energy efficient appliances and renewable energy very attractive, usually with a 3- to 9-year payback (and life-time present value is often double your investment).
       
    The remote work center concept we have been working on, we call E3 because of the win-win-win savings to the employer, employee and environment. Many companies already have a telecommuting option for employees who can work from home, but most companies don’t appreciate all the benefits. Many managers still have the mindset that they want to see your smiling face at work at 8am, no matter how many hours in traffic it takes for you to get there. About 50% to 60% of the current
    commuters should be able to telework once a week or more. This utilizes current technology and does not require any government “help”.
    In all cases of efficiency, we want to measure and record the savings. With consolidated reporting, the savings can be reported to the individual company, while aggregated statistics would be provided by city, region and state. Both the estimates of costs savings for reduced travel and CO2 (CO2 equivalent) savings will be gathered. The carbon savings could, potentially, be sold as carbon
    credits (like in California) or utilized by the company for its own internal costing structure in Corporate Social Responsibility reporting.
    The total costs of commuting are 25 to 30 times more than the costs associated with gas. The lost hours, the stress, the likelihood of getting into accidents, etc., make the complete costs more like $35,000 to $40,000 for a single telecommuter. In 2010, based on significant available research, Kate Lister and Tom Harnish (2010) estimated that the cost savings to the employer were about $21,400 for a full-time telecommuter. The big costs are recruiting, hiring and training a replacement worker when the current employee quits because of the commute, or gets disabled from an accident because of the additional hours per week in traffic. Lister estimated only about $8,000 for the employee, including gas; but we believe it is much more – probably $10,000 to $15,000 – because we focus
    on drive-alone commuters (and include costs that are reasonable, but not included in the 2010 Lister study). The environmental savings are less than $2,000 per telecommuter by Lister, but we estimate that number could be much higher, like $5,000 to $10,000, when considering the big externality costs.
    All things considered, the savings from a full-time-equivalent teleworker could be $40,000 to $50,000 per year. The savings to the employer, employee and environment are massive.

    Individually, we are missing big opportunities every day. Put those savings together for everyone, and it makes a world of difference.


    See – well, listen, actually – to my Solar-Fit Renewable Energy radio show: Elmer Hall on 05/26/18. What do you think?
    You will find other great episodes on Solar-Fit Renewable Energy Radio!:-)
    References
    Hall, E. B. & Hinkelman, R. M. (2018). Perpetual Innovation™: A guide to strategic planning, patent commercialization and enduring competitive advantage, Version 4.0. Morrisville, NC: LuLu Press. ISBN: 978-1-387-31010-4 Retrieved from: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/SBPlan
    Hall, E. B. & Hinkelman, R. M. (2017). Perpetual Innovation™: Patent primer 4.0:
    Patents, the great equalizer of our time! An overview of intellectual property
    for inventors and entrepreneurs.
      Morrisville, NC: LuLu Press.  ISBN:
    978-1-387-07026-8 Retrieved from:
    http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/SBPlan [Amazon v4.0e  ASIN: B074JJCDHG Retrieved from: http://www.amazon.com/dp/B074JJCDHG
    Lister, K. & Harnish, T. (2010, May). Workshifting benefits: The bottom line. Retrieved from http://www.workshifting.com

    Specific Radio Show of Elmer Hall: https://soundcloud.com/flaglerbroadcasting/solar-fit-052618
    The radio show archives: https://solar-fit.com/solar-fit-renewable-energy-show/

    ‘via Blog this’