Category: patent fence

  • Dodgy YayYo IPO advertised on TV – Business Insider

    YayYo IPO advertised on TV – Business Insider:

    Dodgy is probably the best term for Yay Yo IPO, for the inner circle, and for the product-less crowdfunding approach using the JOBS act.

    In the true spirit of a pyramid scheme, Yah Yo has the promise of a product, but there is little or no “there” there.

    They are selling the business model that they will tie in all the ride-share companies like Uber and Lyft into an integrated interface that gives you the best pricing. They generally imply that the BIG 2 unicorns will happily interface with Yay Yo. However, the two world-wide rideshares have insisted that Yay Yo cease and desist from any implicates of partnership.

    So, they say, they will work with the largest 3 to 100 ride share companies. In the US, Uber is down to about 74% with Lyft at about 24%… leaving about 2% for the other players. (See here how Uber’s fortunes have fallen from 91%, including a #deleteUber campaign based on a Trump backlash.)

    The talking head spokesperson/expert in the video is J Peterson from Sienfeld fame, a show about nothing, seems appropriate… An IPO about nothing.

    Comparing to Uber or Lyft that actually produce something and have lots of intellectual property (like patents and such) at their disposal, seems a bit like a reach. People from near and far, think that the advertising of the investment, not the product, is mostly misleading and far from the truth. Taking excess advantage of the Wild-Wild west for small investors made available for low regulation (near no regulation) IPO thanks to the 2012 Jumpstart our Business Startups, or JOBS Act.

    Want to hear an overview of the investor requirements for this “Regulation A+” investment, straight from Elaine’s dodgy boss from Seinfeld look at the bottom right of this page: https://yayyoipo.com/form/ 
    Consider carefully signing up though.

    There should be no comfort in investing in a guy who was banned from public IPO for 5 years because of wildly risky and/or criminal acts in a publicly traded company in the past.

    You read through the SEC filings to see if this is a IPO scam, a dodgy crowdfund, or simply an uber-risky pink-unicorn investment.

    On the plus side, the Business Insider article that started this blog post, YayYo IPO advertised on TV – Business Insider:, is a wonderful overview of the whole JOBS act and really good uses of it to fund smaller businesses and give smaller investors an opportunity to play. Companies that seem to have real products and interesting market niches are Elio and Knightscope. “Regulation A+ IPOs include Elio Motors, which is working on an inexpensive three-wheeled car, and Knightscope, which designs robotic security systems.”

    Ironically, Uber (global) and Lyft (US only) are both private companies, not public, valued at approximately $68B  and $7.5B, respectively. Real revenues in 2016 of about $6.5B and $700m.

    Uber has 298 US patents in force with 117 applications pending (via PatentBuddy), amassing a serious war chest organically and through acquisition. Not just anybody is gonna go jump into this market.

    Lyft got their first patent issued in Sept 31 of 2016 for music preferences (“jukebox”) and its second patent for “ride chaining” almost exactly a year later. The ride chaining patent is about a pickup and drop-off sequence, weaving through a rough terrain of of (Uber) patents.

    I vote for dodge the dodgy, IPO or no.

    ‘via Blog this’

  • IBM Seeks Patent on Software that Incorporates Human Emotion

    IBM Seeks Patent on Software that Incorporates Human Emotion – IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law:

    IBM patents emotions. How does that make your feel? Sad? Mad? Glad?

    Well, let’s not get emotional about this.

    But it seems that our friends at IBM, the patent King, has a rather cleaver line on patents. IBM is making efforts to emulate the types of things done by the human emotions. Multiple channels, multiple inputs.

    One would assume the same illogical and irrational things that make humans so unique and yet so imperfect. Right.

    Steve Brachmann does a nice job of tying in other patent technologies related to communications and information processing that are in the same space.

    I like the comment: “It looks like more than a full time job for IBM just keeping track of who is potentially infringing their patents.”

    True that. But having 10 patents issued per day give IBM a whole lot of leeway if someone comes after IBM.

    ‘via Blog this’

  • Google to sell Motorola to Lenovo for $2.91B – FierceWireless

    Google to sell Motorola to Lenovo for $2.91B – FierceWireless:

    This is a pretty good take on the strategic transaction that Google has entered into with Lenovo.

    The headlines will be very misleading related to the Motorola Wireless deal that Google just made for selling the handset division (hardware) to Lenovo. People will look at the almost $12.4B deal where Google bought some 17,000 and the Motorola wireless division that comes with it in May of 2012. and say that Google gooped up on this transaction. (Somewhat reminiscent of the Skype deals where Microsoft ended up with the technology at a small price compared to what eBay paid a few years earlier.)

    This is a very smart deal by Google. Google is apparently keeping all of the software patents. The licensing (cross-licensing) agreements will probably give Google freedom to do whatever they want in the space. It takes them out of the hardware business, which made handset makers nervous (as an unfair competition with the bundle of handsets with Android OS).

    When Google bought Motorola Mobility as a defensive maneuver. The problem is that Google’s “free” operating system and products tromp on thousands and thousands of patents (and copyrights). So they needed the patent portfolio to fight the patent war in computing and mobility. (Just as Microsoft needed the AOL patents.) Steve Jobs and Apple have been very irritated with Google giving away (their) technology; but it is a little more complicated to sue and make money from a product being sold for $0.00 per unit.

    Even though Google gives many of its products way for “free”, it does make quite a lot of money, primarily from advertising. About 70% of Google’s stock value is attributable to its advertising (about half PC and half mobile). Google now is at a market cap of $380B bringing it up quickly onto size of the two largest market cap companies in the world Apple ($450B) and ExxonMobil ($411B) as of Jan 30 2014.

    So now Google has the patent protection they had to have, and they have sold it too. Beautiful. Now they can move into the offensive position in the patent wars. This is a game of Risk, but with multiple dimensions like 3-level chess. There is what you see above the board, but what is below the board — where the patent portfolios live — is where the armies are being amassed.

    Make no doubt, small players will be crushed. Blackberry and maybe even Nokia will likely be completely isolated. Orphaned.

    This will give Samsung a little competition. Samsung dominates the cell phone market, especially among android phones. See add to Samsung Worries. Google can not afford to allow Samsung to get too big and too strong.

    From Googles perspective, this is a work of motion art. Beautiful.

    Other players, say Apple, may not appreciate the beauty of it so much.

    ‘via Blog this’