Category: patent

  • Google to sell Motorola to Lenovo for $2.91B – FierceWireless

    Google to sell Motorola to Lenovo for $2.91B – FierceWireless:

    This is a pretty good take on the strategic transaction that Google has entered into with Lenovo.

    The headlines will be very misleading related to the Motorola Wireless deal that Google just made for selling the handset division (hardware) to Lenovo. People will look at the almost $12.4B deal where Google bought some 17,000 and the Motorola wireless division that comes with it in May of 2012. and say that Google gooped up on this transaction. (Somewhat reminiscent of the Skype deals where Microsoft ended up with the technology at a small price compared to what eBay paid a few years earlier.)

    This is a very smart deal by Google. Google is apparently keeping all of the software patents. The licensing (cross-licensing) agreements will probably give Google freedom to do whatever they want in the space. It takes them out of the hardware business, which made handset makers nervous (as an unfair competition with the bundle of handsets with Android OS).

    When Google bought Motorola Mobility as a defensive maneuver. The problem is that Google’s “free” operating system and products tromp on thousands and thousands of patents (and copyrights). So they needed the patent portfolio to fight the patent war in computing and mobility. (Just as Microsoft needed the AOL patents.) Steve Jobs and Apple have been very irritated with Google giving away (their) technology; but it is a little more complicated to sue and make money from a product being sold for $0.00 per unit.

    Even though Google gives many of its products way for “free”, it does make quite a lot of money, primarily from advertising. About 70% of Google’s stock value is attributable to its advertising (about half PC and half mobile). Google now is at a market cap of $380B bringing it up quickly onto size of the two largest market cap companies in the world Apple ($450B) and ExxonMobil ($411B) as of Jan 30 2014.

    So now Google has the patent protection they had to have, and they have sold it too. Beautiful. Now they can move into the offensive position in the patent wars. This is a game of Risk, but with multiple dimensions like 3-level chess. There is what you see above the board, but what is below the board — where the patent portfolios live — is where the armies are being amassed.

    Make no doubt, small players will be crushed. Blackberry and maybe even Nokia will likely be completely isolated. Orphaned.

    This will give Samsung a little competition. Samsung dominates the cell phone market, especially among android phones. See add to Samsung Worries. Google can not afford to allow Samsung to get too big and too strong.

    From Googles perspective, this is a work of motion art. Beautiful.

    Other players, say Apple, may not appreciate the beauty of it so much.

    ‘via Blog this’

  • The Energy Roadmap – The Edison of our Age: Stan Ovshinsky … Who killed the Electric Car?… a who dun it of history.

    Ovshinsky is compared to Edison as a prolific inventor… He hold patents on NiMH batteries. His solar cells power the MIR space station.
    Good question on Cobasys and the restrictions on next-gen batteries by the patents held within the company.!:-) The batteries that have become so critical in the next generation of batteries, electric cars, etc. are subject to patents by Ovshinsky (and the Cobasys company).
    Cobasys is a 50/50 joint venture with Chevron/Texico and Ovonics. Ovonics has the Stan Ovshinsky inventions and GM now has a big ownership stake in that company.
    So let’s see, a BIG oil and a BIG auto have a BIG stake in the very batteries that make an electric car viable.
    Look at “Patent encumbrances” at Wikipedia. The discussion on “Who Killed the Electric Car?” seem far truer than I ever imagined. This whole topic requires a lot more reading. But before picking up the thread again, I want to watch the movie.
    Anybody out there have big ideas (substantiated by facts, I hope) on the issue.
    Keywords: electric car, EV, oil, auto, battery, patent, patent encumbrances, inventor, Ovshinsky 

    See similar blog over in www.SustainZine.com

  • The Energy Roadmap – The Edison of our Age: Stan Ovshinsky and the Future of Energy [Video Interview Part 1]

    The Energy Roadmap – The Edison of our Age: Stan Ovshinsky and the Future of Energy [Video Interview Part 1]:

    Ovshinsky is compared to Edison as a prolific inventor… He hold patents on NiMH batteries. His solar cells power the MIR space station.

    Good question on Cobasys and the restrictions on next-gen batteries by the patents held within the company.!:-) The batteries that have become so critical in the next generation of batteries, electric cars, etc. are subject to patents by Ovshinsky (and the Cobasys company).

    Cobasys is a 50/50 joint venture with Chevron/Texico and Ovonics. Ovonics has the Stan Ovshinsky inventions and GM now has a big ownership stake in that company.

    So let’s see, a BIG oil and a BIG auto have a BIG stake in the very batteries that make an electric car viable.

    Look at “Patent encumbrances” at Wikipedia. The discussion on “Who Killed the Electric Car?” seem far truer than I ever imagined. This whole topic requires a lot more reading. But before picking up the thread again, I want to watch the movie.

    Anybody out there have big ideas (substantiated by facts, I hope) on the issue.

    Keywords: electric car, EV, oil, auto, battery, patent, patent encumbrances, inventor,

    ‘via Blog this’

  • Secrecy cloaks patents on inventions in Canada: NSA for IP

    Secrecy cloaks patents on inventions hidden far from public eye by Industry Canada:

    Wow.
    So in Canada you can have your patent applications totally shielded from all view/publication. And, we presume, against your will and better judgement. But only for National Security.

    One would assume, that you will have lots of problems, then, if you were to consider bringing it to market commercially (non-military).

    And, here in the US of A, we are grappling with how best to spy on our citizens. (President Obama’s news conference today. See here on News conference.

    Patent applications are the agreement between government and inventor to arrange and organized disclosure of inventions and grant monopoly power over that invention for up to 20 years. US patent law & USPTO.gov.

    Public disclosure is a key word here.

    This is kind of interesting: secret patents. Canada must be taking its lead from the NSA!:-(

    Don’t you love it.?!

    ‘via Blog this’

  • Patent law changes alter entrepreneurs' planning

    Patent law changes alter entrepreneurs’ planning:

    This is a nice article by Laura Baverman about patents and how they needed to be integrated into the business plan and entrepreneurs’ strategy. Since the US is now first-to-file, inventors must get their foot in the proverbial patent door early, often with a provisional patent while the details are being worked out.

    This article also slips in the key provisions related to the laws and fees that were enacted in March of 2013.

    Although the fees have all been dramatically increased, especially the follow-on maintenance fees, there is actually a micro-entity option that is only 25% of the full fee structure for large entities. (To qualify as micro, you must not have a high income and not have too many patents in your name.)

    There are a few things that are are perfectly touched on in such a short article. There’s a quick look at the staging process to protect the invention without bankrupting the small inventor. There’s a side story about the great use of a business incubator for a specific company, EnerLeap, the next-best Lithium battery.

    There’s the indication of how IP must be specifically budgeted into the business plan. Your business plan must have the budget for IP, it must have the timing for IP expenses (patent, TM, Lawyer, R&D, engineering, etc.), and it must accommodate contingencies for litigation.

    Of course, you still want to include the high margins and royalties from licensing in your income stream, you simply need to demonstrate that you have a sound plan for getting to that point.

    Great article Laura!

    Check out the Patent Primer 2.0, part of the Perpetual Innovation(tm) series, by Hall and Hinkelman (2013) at: http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/SBPlan   … or … Kindle eBook at: www.TinyURL.com/IPPrimer2

    Visit SBP’s IP web site at: www.IPplan.com 

    ‘via Blog this’