Category: Shaklee

  • Mind that matters, misleading AARP… take it or leave it list

    The quick lists of 5 things to do and 5 things not to do
    often provide inaccurate or even misleading information. AARP usually provides
    a nice sound bite of information about various things. Mental health comes up
    every year with a interesting brain
    health infographic
    in October 2016 (discover, connect, move, nourish, and
    relax). The December 2017 edition of AARP had a big section on brain health and
    avoiding Alzheimer’s disease. (Also see risk
    factors related to Alzheimer’s
    .) The Guard
    Your Mental Health section by Marty Munson
    offered a “take it” or “leave
    it” for several items. The thumbs up items were exercise, friends+family, manage
    blood pressure, and nutrition (Mediterranean diet as an example). Evidence
    shows that stimulating your brain met with mixed results; the way how you stimulate
    your brain is important so some things – even listening to music – work better
    than others.
    The last three items really were surprising, and
    questionable.  Don’t sweat the aluminum
    in your antiperspirant since there is no evidence to link the trace aluminum from deodorants to mental health issues. (The lack of friends because
    you don’t use deodorants might also be a factor in the use-vs-don’t-use
    antiperspirant decision.) This is interesting, and it appears to be accurate.
    Trace amounts of aluminum should not be a big issue; aluminum is a very common element
    and we are continually exposed to it.
    The idea to leave Ginseng was intriguing. It does not appear
    to help significantly with brain function; and, as with many supplements, there
    could be side-effects, especially for people with other health factors like
    diabetes. This sent me to look at the Shaklee product, MindWorks®, and the
    active ingredients that are rather strongly promoted with positive research. The ingredients in MindWorks all show pretty strong evidence to
    support a healthier body and brain: chardonnay
    grape seed extract
    , Guarana extract,
    blueberries,
    and green
    coffee bean extract
    . These ingredients have been shown to reduce
    cholesterol, improve blood flow, offer anti-oxidation, and improve cognitive
    function.
    True, Ginseng has very little evidence to contribute to brain
    health (and reduced Alzheimer’s), but many other supplements do. Shaklee
    provides one of the best overviews on the subject of
    Alzheimer’s
    . Of course, general health, is critical. Anti-oxidants like B,
    E, and C are critical. There is a lot of support showing benefits from Gingko. So
    “leave it” related to Ginseng, seems accurate, but highly misleading, because
    it implies that there are no natural health remedies.
    The really big erroneous and misleading factor; however, is the
    “leave it” for supplements. Not to fault Munson, specifically, there are
    several studies that show that people who take supplements are no more healthy
    than those who don’t take any supplements. However, the biggest landmark study on the issue compared
    people who took multiple Shaklee supplements (not just a multivitamin) with
    those who did not take any supplements at all. This landmark study (Block, et al., 2007) was
    conducted in 2007, but ongoing research continues to support its accuracy. The
    people who took the multiple vitamins were far healthier, even compared to
    people taking only a single multivitamin. Being general healthier is also
    directly correlated to brain health.
    Shaklee recommends that people have an active and healthy
    lifestyle. If you don’t consistently eat well, then you should take supplements. For people worried about aging well, Shaklee offers a trifecta of
    products: MindWorks® as discussed above; Vivix® which is a patented resveratrol
    blend that is 13x more effective than resveratrol alone (vs gallons of red wine
    daily); and OmegaGuard® which provides a pharmaceutical grade omega-3 that helps
    to improve heart health. 
    You will notice that many of the labels on Shaklee
    supplements are unique. The DTX
    Liver Health
    ® does not say “active ingredient” it actually says “medicinal” information!
    They can only say that with actual clinical support. MindWorks™ says “Helps
    improve mental sharpness & focus and protect against age-related mental
    decline.**”.
    Resveratrol (Shaklee’s Vivix®) is the one
    supplement you should take for age-related protection. There are literally
    thousands of studies showing the health and age-protection associated with
    resveratrol. You could drink a dozen or so glasses of Muscatine wine (or juice)
    each day which, arguably, might have its own set of side-effects; or you could
    take Vivix. With Vivix being magnitudes (13x) more effective than the available
    resveratrol alternatives, it seems like the best available alternative, even if
    it is a little pricy.
    While we are on the miracle of Vivix,
    there are two new categories of products from Shaklee: Youth™ for
    rejuvenation of skin care which actually rebuilds the collagen layer of the
    skin (without Botox surgery); and treatment for eye health where age-related macular
    degeneration is actually reversed/improved.
    Of 
    course, changes in unhealthy lifestyle should come first, and foremost.
    Quitting smoking, for example, will start saving money instantly, and extend
    your life dramatically.
    Okay, okay. This looks like it is an
    advert for Shaklee. A place that is usually great for unbiased information is
    Wikipedia. But several entries on the Great Wiki in the sky are not only
    misleading, they are inaccurate. Look at the health benefit for resveratrol. Cancer is one sentence that says that resveratrol won’t cure cancer.
    HUH!?? That may, or may not be true, but what about the hundreds of studies
    that show it will lower the risks of you getting cancer in the first place…
    One sentence that misrepresents a single study in 2011 (Fernandez & Fraga)
    to say there is no evidence in any way related to longevity in humans. There is
    evidence in mammals, according to their review of available research, and further research in humans
    will likely find similar support (which this study didn’t find because they apparently
    weren’t looking very hard).
    [At some point, I expect to come back to
    Wikipedia to fix some of these entries, it is in everyone’s best interest to
    have accurate and factual info there; unfortunately, the resveratrol “article”
    requires a total rewrite.]
    So, yes, I trust the Shaklee information
    as a great place to start, and a trustworthy source of nutritional information.
    They are in the business of selling products too, but a well-educated, health
    and wellness conscious consumer/distributor is critical to Shaklee’s mission
    and ongoing success. Shaklee has been producing vitamins/supplement organically
    for decades, environmentally friendly household products for about a century
    and has operated at a zero carbon footprint since Y2K.
    Shaklee is a nice picture of sustainability.
    Living healthier and longer, sounds good too.
    We at SustainZine would like to
    wish you a healthy, wealthy and happy 2018.
    References
    Agustín F. Fernández & Mario F. Fraga (2011) The effects of the dietary polyphenol
    resveratrol on human healthy aging and lifespan
    , Epigenetics, 6:7, 870-874,
    doi: 10.4161/epi.6.7.16499

    Block, G., Jensen, C. D., Norkus, E. P., Dalvi, T. B., Wong,
    L. G., McManus, J. F., & Hudes, M. L. (2007). Usage patterns, health, and nutritional status of long-term multiple
    dietary supplement users: a cross-sectional study
    . Nutrition Journal, 6(1).
    doi:10.1186/1475-2891-6-30
  • Innovation: Social Irresponsibility: Energy, cost of carbon

    Check out the workings for markets in Carbon…


    Cap n trade, tax and trade, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).

    • Australia does Carbon Tax and shift.
    • Texas sets up a Carbon Exchange.
    • California has a huge lift in the prices of Carbon allocations (CCA) because of the down time of a nuclear power plant.

    Overall, the price per ton of carbon is now at between $8 and $23.


    Anything above free, is probably a very good thing for the true costs of energy.


    SustainZine: Social Irresponsibility: Energy, cost of carbon

    Coming soon to an eBook store near you: Social Responsibility by the www.RefractiveThinker.com. 
  • Social Irresponsibility: Energy and the cost of carbon

    These are all part of a dramatic change in the way that we view carbon emissions.


    There are three things that are prominently in the news about carbon emissions and addressing them in June of 2012. These are all part of a dramatic change in the way that we view carbon emissions.

    1. Australia is opening up a Carbon Tax at $23 per ton. They are adjusting from the mistakes of Europe when they started cap and trade at too low a price. Undermining the whole process.
    2. In the meanwhile, Texas is opening a market for carbon. The Oil capital of the US is also the largest Wind producer of electricity.
    3. California credit allowances jump in price dramatically.
    Generally there are three ways to address the issues associated with externalities caused by carbon emission (and greenhouse gas emissions)

    1. Voluntary corporate social responsibility (CSR). Look at Shaklee corporation and Microsoft. Shaklee, a health and nutrition company, is the first company to be certified climate neutral in April 2010. In the meanwhile, Microsoft intends to be carbon neutral by the end of 2013.

    2. Cap and Trade exchanges. Texas and California.

    a.   Texas is opening a market for carbon. “Bad joke, or perhaps an oxymoron”, right?  Nope, it is the Texas Climate & Carbon Exchange. The Oil capital of the US that produces about 1m barrels of oil per year is also the largest Wind producer of electricity (producing about 6.5m GHw/hr in 2010, nearly twice as much as Kansas). This is one of several exchanges, with the most notable one in the us operating in California.
    b.   This headline from Reuters: “California carbon allowances (CCAs) for delivery in 2013 closed at $16.75 per tonne on Thursday, up $1.10 from one week ago on a growing belief that the shutdown of a California nuclear power plant will boost carbon emissions due to higher fossil fuel use.” A 7% jump was followed by $20+ call options that anticipated future CCAs rising aggressively in the future.

    3. Tax Mechanism.
    The carbon pricing scheme will impose costs on big polluters, which will result in higher end prices for certain products. Treasury estimates that an average family will pay $9.90 more per week in the first year of the scheme’s introduction.” But 9 out of 10 households will get some level of reimbursements “ through personal income tax cuts and increases in pensions and allowances, as well as other measures”. This will already take effect from May-June 2012. Check out the Household Carbon tax estimator for Australia 

    a.   What is the Carbon Tax? (Australia):  http://www.carbontax.net.au/category/what-is-the-carbon-tax/ A $23 per ton initial tax on heavy polluters.
    c.   Discussion (Australia). Australia is one of the worst (developed countries) for carbon footprint per capita. Unlike Canada (cold) this is partially because of the sprawl of the country and the abundance of fossil fuels. The tax is directly on the producers of carbon (starting with coal) and this tax is applied directly to those impacted. Those households impacted can spend the money any way they want.  The more accurate costs of dirtier energy (coal and oil) will serve to shift prices to cleaner energy.

    So, what does this mean? It means that in lots of places and within lots of organizations (and governments) there is a movement toward addressing carbon emissions. Even the glacial movements in the US are starting gain speed, much like the melting glaciers themselves are.


    A market mechanism like Australia’s seems like an good approach. There is not a massive initial gift of credits to the coal-burning companies. The government doesn’t take all the money and run. The market is given an opportunity to improve the costing to accommodate the externalities of fossil fuels.


    Let’s see how that plays forward? 


    Coming soon to an eBook store near you: Social Responsibility by the www.RefractiveThinker.com