Category: solar power

  • SolarInvest2020: Residential Quick Take on Doing Good

    Residential Solar can be a good investment. Good Savings.
     
    [UPDATE: 30% Investment Tax Credit on renewables in the IRA Act. See our Blog post here. This makes all the financial discussions below much more profitable. Also, higher inflation and higher power inflation.]
    Anyone thinking of putting solar on a residential property will obviously
    be friendly to doing a good deed for the environment, but would also like to
    understand the financial implications. There are subtleties to the analysis
    that are critical to appreciate the full benefits of setting up a solar power
    system to replace your residential utility power. We have become accustomed to
    renting power as a way of life. There’s a paradigm shift needed to appreciate
    owning your own power system and saving on a monthly power bill. Hall has a
    detailed article
    Residential Solar is
    Good, but Commercial Solar can be Crazy Profitable!
    that you will want to
    read as you think further about the financial analysis for a specific solar
    project, especially a business project. Here are the key points for a
    residential solar system.
    Profitable. Solar can be profitable for a
    homeowner to purchase, but there are additional considerations that usually
    make the decision even better than it might appear at first glance.
    Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC). The ITC reduces
    income taxes by 26% of the system price, so you only pay 84% of the price of
    the system. This ITC goes down to zero (0%) by 2022.
    Easy Loan Option. A homeowner will usually have
    several loan options available, including using a home equity line of credit
    (HELOC) or financing affiliated with the solar company. (Lease options are also
    available from some installers, and may be a good option for a homeowner with
    lower credit and low house equity.)
    Positive Cash Flows. Household budget should be
    cash positive compared to power bills. Frequently, loan options include
    interest-only for a year until the ITC is realized (and applied to the loan).
    What would have gone to the IRS in taxes is applied to the solar system, and
    what would have gone to the power company goes to pay off the loan for the
    power system you own.
    Annual Return. The savings each year could
    easily be 7% return each year on the net investment.
    Avoid Utility Power Price Increases. If the
    power company increased rates by 1% (or 2%) a year, the real savings from the
    solar system could be 8% (or 9%).
    Sunk Operating Costs. This is not a normal
    financial analysis, so different perspective is helpful. If the residence is
    being used, then the electricity to operate it is needed. The money is already
    being committed to rent a little bit of the power plant from the utility power
    indefinitely. Or, you could buy your own power system. You could pay less in
    loan payments than what the power bill would have been and then have free power
    for decades thereafter. Committed, or sunk operating costs, is one aspect of
    the buy-solar decision that takes a little perspective adjustment to fully appreciate,
    but savings is another.

    After-tax Savings. After-tax savings is a
    beautiful thing, especially if it is recurring every month. You pay the power
    bill in after-tax dollars. So every dollar saved on your budget for electricity
    is better than a dollar increase in your salary. Consider a 30% marginal income
    tax level. (Marginal tax rate is on the next $1 of income or savings, not the average
    income which have no taxes at the lowest levels.) At 30% marginal tax rate, you
    would need $1.30 to have an extra $1 to spend on your power bill if power costs
    went up next year by $1. There are other deductions, plus your employer has expenses
    and deductions, so costs to your employer would be $1.50 or more for you to
    have an extra $1 raise for your power bill, which would leave you with the same
    discretionary income as the past year. Savings related to power is pure
    discretionary income, spend it anywhere you want… You just got a raise!
    Net Metered. The usual way to go solar on
    residential is to connect to the utility power with net metering, a measured
    meter that takes your solar power as you produce it and gives you back the
    power when you need it. If you over produce at the end of the year, the power
    company typically rebates you – but usually at a rather paltry rate – for your
    extra power. Therefore, you would typically size the system to your
    (anticipated) needs, and not much more.
    Batteries. If you want to have your own power
    when the grid is down, you will want to get batteries. Battery prices and
    technology, like the Tesla PowerWall, is really starting to hit critical mass.
    Batteries can also be eligible for the 26% investment tax credit.
    Solar System is an Asset. The basic accounting
    for a solar paid for by a loan might look like this. Buy a $30,000 solar system
    (an asset) by borrowing $30,000 on your HELOC (a loan). If you didn’t think the
    system was worth $30,000 (because of the power it produces for decades), you
    probably wouldn’t have bought it. But, you get an investment tax credit of 26%
    in 2020 so the actual system cost (after eliminated income taxes of $7,800) is
    only $22,200. You can go on vacation with the $7,800 or apply it to the loan.
    However, this is a performing asset that produces power for decades, long after
    the loan is paid.
    What if You Sell the Home? With the home
    producing its own electricity, the operating costs are reduced by the power
    savings. The money that would have gone to the power company can now easy be
    applied to the purchase price of the home (and to a mortgage). The value of the
    house goes up, typically by the net cost of the solar system or more. Even when
    the solar loan is paid off, the value to property is the ongoing power savings
    being produced (maybe 10 to 20 times the annual power savings).
    What if You Rent the House? Renting the house
    is rather simple, simply include the value of the utility power in the rent.
    The renter should have been budgeting monthly operations (as should you in
    considering a tenant), so the money for power would be shifted into rent. The
    portion of rent associated with power might be lower than what the power bill
    would have been, and electric cost from the solar system might be fixed without
    matching the price increases that would have occurred from the utility.
    Win-win.
    Environmental Savings. The environmental
    savings are tied to the utility power you are replacing. Check your energy mix
    from your favorite (only) power utility. US-wide the 2019 electric mix was
    NatGas (38.4%), Coal (23.5%), nuclear (19.7%), hydro/thermal (6.6%) and wind
    7.3%. Solar was up from 1.8% to 2.6% of electricity power by the end of 2019. Fossil
    fuels produce huge pollution and greenhouse gases. Probably as important is the
    massive amounts of water used in operating fossil fuel and nuclear power plants.
    Doing Good. Most of the people who have gone
    solar did so for altruistic reasons, they simply wanted to be kinder to the
    planet and do their part to make things better. Lucky for us now, the
    technology has gotten much better and the prices have dropped to the point that
    solar is simply a good financial decision as well. Now we can do financially well
    by doing good.

    Strategic Business Planning Company website: SBPlan.com Blog: SustainZine.com

  • EV on SB2020

    EVs, aka Electric Vehicles, were the big winners of the
    Super Bowl 2020. Everybody had an electric car for the occasion. Audi and even
    a new EV version of the gas-guzzling Hummer.
    Imagine the king of EVs, Tesla,
    jumping $130 per share on Super Monday! TSLA popped 20% up to almost $800 per
    share, nearing a $150B market cap firmly – 3 times the value of GM. Then on
    Super Tuesday, Tesla jumps another $100 to reach over $900 (to $164B market
    cap). Arguably, there are a few extra factors making Tesla’s stock pop: an
    upgrade and short squeeze. Maybe a little overpriced?
    Tesla has a market share of about
    1.5%, so… it does have room to run. But only if you believe that we have
    reached an inflection point where a shift to most or all cars will be electric.
    Fortunately, the charging stations are now pretty will established.
    But, the average age of cars on
    the road today are 11 years old. Even if we move to 50% EV in 10 years, it will
    take decades for half of the cars on the road to be electric. Longer, of course,
    for trucks because they are just now starting to ship.
    Still, the trend toward EVs is
    definitive. Everyone has a few. Some auto manufactures are no longer
    introducing new gas or diesel models.
    You would think that the drop of
    oil prices (down to $50 for WTI) this week on the corona virus scare might be a
    boost to gas models?
    Related to market cap, remember
    that Tesla bought sister company Solar City so it does solar systems and
    battery banks (PowerWall). Tesla GigaFactories crank out batteries (with
    partner Panasonic). With the cost of batteries dropping, both EV and storage
    become more and more affordable. The big thing to look for in battery
    technology is the move to safer and/or more powerful technology. Big break
    throughs in battery tech – cheaper, better, lighter – will be game changing.
    Tesla stands to win in every case, old lithium or new whatever.
    I could not bring myself to buy
    Tesla stock at $200 in June; over $900 is nose-bleed levels today. But, it does
    suggest a momentum shift to EVs in our future.
  • Opportunity Lost by Waiting until 2020 for Solar Investment

    [UPDATE: 30% Investment Tax Credit on renewables in the
    IRA Act 2022. See our Blog post here. This makes all the financial discussions
    below much more profitable. Also, higher inflation and higher power inflation.]

    The Renewable Investment Tax Credit, which is currently in
    2019 at 30% of the qualifying investment, is a wonderful incentive to put in
    renewable power including solar, wind and qualifying battery backup. The ITC
    will drop down by 4% in 2020 and then again by 4% in 2021. After 2021, the ITC
    drops off a cliff, to 10% for businesses and zero (0%) for residential. Here is
    the stepdown in Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC): https://seia.org/initiatives/solar-investment-tax-credit-itc





















    You can still get your foot in the door on the tax credits
    in December. The “Safe Harbor” on ITC pertains to launching the investment in
    the current year and locking in that higher level of tax credit. The safe
    harbor allows businesses to take advantage of the current ITC rate even though
    they didn’t allow enough time to fully install this year. Generally, figure 5%
    or more down payment in the current year and continuous progress toward the
    finished project. One reason for the safe harbor, in general, is that someone
    might want to launch in 2020, but there is such an end-of-year demand for solar
    panels that it is not possible to get them before January 1st.
    Winter storms, trade storms, government permits during holidays, etc., might
    delay the full installation before the year ends.
    Safe Harbor requires continuous progress on the solar project,
    and there is a fixed deadline when the system must be completed to maintain the
    qualification for the higher tax credit. Here are some details on when the
    investment must start, and finalize, in order to be eligible for the higher
    ITC: https://www.foley.com/en/insights/publications/2019/09/solar-renewable-energy-investment-tax-credits

    Solar Example in December of 2019

    So let’s work an example for a business that has a $100,000
    solar investment in consideration in 2019. (See the table below.)
    First there’s the $30k tax credit that reduces the business tax
    liabilities, dollar for dollar. This is money that you simply do not pay out to
    the IRS. Then there’s the possibility of 100% depreciation of an asset in the
    first year, so the tax shield is based on the reduction in net income based on
    depreciation. (The tax shield is equal to the tax rate times the amount of
    depreciation; the asset basis is reduced by half of the ITC, or 33% of $85k in
    this example.) Therefore, the actual investment is only about 42% of the solar
    system costs, once all the tax benefits of the investment are considered. If
    the savings are $7,200 yearly (assuming no increases in power costs), then
    there’s a 17% return on investment each year. Simple payback is less than 6
    years!



    That is crazy profitable for a long-term investment. It is especially
    profitable when considering that the business is already committing to paying
    for power indefinitely from the power company. So, taking a loan of say 15
    years could result in loan payments that are lower than the payments for power,
    especially when considering that the power company raises rates (you should
    figure at least the rate of CPI inflation). At 2% power inflation, the net
    present value (NPV) of the investment jumps to $108k from about $75k (30 years
    at 4.5% loan rate).
    So the investment is profitable. Very profitable. But what
    if you want to do the investment next year? What is the cost of waiting? I’m
    glad you asked!
    With the safe harbor on Solar ITC you can lock in the ITC
    savings this year. You will need to put 5% down in 2019 and starting progress
    on the system. Here’s what your cashflow would look like for 2019: $30k ITC
    savings in taxes less the $5k deposit on the solar system. That’s a positive
    $25k cash flow this year.



    Since the investment tax credit drops by 4% (to 26% in 2020)
    the lost ITC is $4,000 if you buy the solar system and take the tax credit in
    2020. The $4,000 opportunity loss, compared to the $5,000 deposit in 2019 is only
    $1,000 difference. If you plan to do the solar system anyway, then the costs of delay are relatively large, especially when adding a year of power savings. The delay for a year could easily be a loss of $10k or
    more in opportunity lost.

    Solar is a Different Kind of Investment

    There are two major points, however, that make this
    different from most typical investment analyses. (Three, really, if you were to
    discuss the environmental savings, but that’s for another article.) First, the
    money your spending is committed money for power as long as the business is
    open and operating. Taking a loan to buy the solar system might prove to be
    cash positive indefinitely. Take $100,000 loan; pay interest only of $4,500
    (4.5%) for first year or two until you realize the tax benefits of the solar
    ITC and depreciation; apply the tax savings to the loan; and then make payments
    on the loan for 8 years. The loan payments could be about $1,000 less per year
    than what you would have paid in electric bills, especially as the cost of
    power from the utility company increase over time. Once the loan is paid off,
    the price of power that you generate for yourself is pure profit!
    Speaking of profit, here is the second point. Every dollar
    you reduce your power bill is pure profit. Things like smart thermostats, insulation,
    weather stripping, adjusting habits/processes, etc. might result in reducing
    the power bill by 5% to 25% at little or no out-of-pocket costs. That could
    result in a perpetuity of savings. If the firm’s cost of capital is, let’s say 8%,
    then the present value of the perpetuity of savings of $1,200 per year
    ($100/mo) would be $15,000 in present value terms. Plus, being more energy
    efficient means that a smaller system is required when going solar.
    An even more interesting concept related to energy savings
    is looking at the sales volume required to equal the $7,200 savings annually.
    If the firm has a 10% profit margin, the sales to cover the power bill is
    $72,000 per year (once the loan is payed off). In the current loan example,
    cash flows (savings really) are positive every year and go up based on power
    inflation. When the loan is payed off in year 11 you start to realize huge
    savings (profits).
    By the way, someone buying this property would pay more for
    the business because it comes with “free” electricity. A Lawrence-Berkley study
    found that some properties would appreciate by 20 times the annual electric
    savings. Therefore, the property might be worth about $144k more based on 20
    times the $7,200 annual savings. Since the net investment after taxes is about
    $42k, the property could appreciate about $102k over the solar investment.
    That’s a property appreciation of almost 3.5 times the net investment.

    In short, the investment in solar power can be crazy
    profitable. After January, it is not quite so crazy profitable. But, if you are
    planning to go solar in 2020, you need to seriously consider launching the
    project in 2019 and reaping the additional tax savings (and energy) savings.

    About SBP.
    Strategic Business Planning Company has been working on various telework, solar
    and energy efficiency projects. There are several factors that we consider in a
    more comprehensive analysis of a Solar investment that are not represented
    here. We also enjoy doing the planning associated with Intellectual Property
    (Patents) ventures; look for our Perpetual
    Innovation
    ™ line of books on patent commercialization.
  • Renewable energy of Wind and Solar no longer needs subsidies

    Nice Bloomberg article here. Renewable of Wind and Solar are now cheaper than coal, oil, gas, nuclear. No big need for subsidies to make them competitive.
    But, there’s also no need, quite the contrary given the externality costs, for subsidizing fossil fuels!
    Nice article with great graphics show the fall in price for wind and solar.

  • Babcock Ranch aims to be first solar-powered town in US | USA News | Al Jazeera

    Babcock Ranch aims to be first solar-powered town in US | USA News | Al Jazeera:

    This is in partnership with FPL (Nextera) for the power. The powerplant is already up and running that will support an almost 200,000 home community.  FPL has extended the solar to include 10 megawatts of battery, thus allowing the solar power plant to offer more flexibility to the power grid and on-demand peaking power.

    The 440 acres for the power plant (now with about 350,000 PV panels) were donated to FPL at the Babcock Ranch. The whole town is 100% electric with electric trolley and charging stations. They even have SolarTrees(tm) for you to charge your phone or laptop in the park and demonstrate how solar works.

    This city is west of LaBelle on the way toward Ft Meyers. Very sustainable. Now has several developers building and each home has the “option” to have solar installed.

    Here’s another take with a human touch from FoxNews. Talking about the first people to move into the “city” and the first baby to be born in Babcock Ranch.

    This is a very cool example of how a city can be built from the ground up as sustainable — zero carbon footprint, as it pertains to electricity. There is the obvious question, however, of urban sprawl to suburbia, that has had suburban sprawl.

    In a city, with lots and lots of impermeable surfaces (roofs and parking lots), it would be very possible to retrofit the sustainability solutions.

    Way to go FPL. Within five years (2023), FPL plans to produce more from solar than from coal+NatGas combined. Additionally, FPL’s sister company FPL Energy is the largest wind producer in the US, and 2nd largest in the world. !:-)  … NextEra is the publicly ~$75B market cap holding company (NEE).

    FPL does have some nuclear, with plans and approval for expansion. The Turkey Point plant has been problematic and has its own set of issues. Leaks in the cooling canals, and no real plan for ways to store nuclear waste, has the Sierra Club (a group that should generally be friendly to nuclear) up in arms.  They also don’t like some of the sweet-heart deals for FPL that have been approved (rubber-stamped) by the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC). The sneaky and deceptive amendment on the Florida ballet last year — a move designed to kill solar — by the southern power companies (in which FPL donated $8m) is still fresh in the minds of Floridians.

    Nuclear in general has issues in the future energy mix. Nuclear is wonderful for base load, but not great as a peaking power source. If/when we move seriously and definitively toward solar in Florida, there should be high renewable energy at various times throughout the day, and none during rain or at night, so nuclear continues to be less effective. See how California is planning the retirement of the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant and looking for other forms of peaking power as more and more power comes from renewables. Nuclear plants seem to have no plan, of any kind, as to what to do with nuclear wast; the only plan seems to be to hold on-site forever.

    At some point the power monopolies need to deal with the reality that every home and every business can and will generate part or all of their electricity. This means that the future of the grid is connecting power creators with power consumers using a smart grid and dynamic pricing. Part of the day I may be a net producer, part of the night I may be a net consumer. One analogy of this type of Smart Grid is to think of it like the Internet. Sometimes I’m uploading content, sometimes I’m downloading. The Internet directs from where power is produced, to where it is needed. The Smart Grid power company will be more like the Internet Service Provider (ISP) of old by providing power as needed, where needed. The internet of things (IoT), but with power, is essentially what we’re talking about. Maybe the Energy of Everything (EoE)?:-)

    Power companies need a new business model (currently the model is based on ROE with the PSC assuring prices that justify a good return on investment). Producing and selling more and more electricity to make more and more money is a broken model. Building bigger and grander centralized power plants is horribly inefficient; about 60% of energy is lost in the production (steam) and distribution.

    We are really glad to see FPL’s effort into solar. Florida, and NextEra, could do more. Time for the power monopolies to make the change before they get overrun. The power model is changing… Trying to block this massive change is a little like stacking rocks in front of a glacier …

    ‘via Blog this’