Category: sustainability

  • Video on Oil: Supply, Demand, Contango, Sustainability, Future

    Elmer Hall produced a video June 1 2020 related to the Oil Contago in April of 2020: Conundrum Of Oil Contango: Supply n Demand, Sustainability and the Future.

    Much like a race with a distinct start and finish, you can look at oil and the future the same way. Although it might take a little longer than 20+ minutes, and not have a definitive finish-line, the oil play has a future that can not be good for the oil producers. By definition, things that are non-sustainable must end — sooner or later. Gracefully or ungracefully. Elmer Hall does a video about oil. The tragic shutdown of economies has also produced a magical moment for people to observe what the air (and water) might look like if we stopped burning coal and oil. Clean air for cities across the world; for some people, the first time in their life when the air was safely breathable.
    So what did the shutdown do for oil demand, and consequently for the oil supply and demand? Oil, at 100M Barrels per day represents about 4.4% (or $4.5T) of the worlds 2019 GDP. With the collapse of demand and price, that represents only about $1T.
    But the true cost of oil and coal is massively higher than we pay at the meter or the pump. This video discusses the likelihood that things will be different post-COVID. The genie is out of the bottle related to telework; workers who can work remotely will not want to go back to grid traffic commutes. People who have breathed clean air will not want to go back to smog and air quality warnings.
    The Oil contango in the 3rd week of April was a once-in-a-lifetime event where owners of the futures contract (in May) would have to take possession of the oil at the close of the contract that week. But, with the world swimming in oil, there was no place to put the oil. So owners who had to get out of the contract — and no place to store it if they kept the contract — were willing to PAY buyers to take the oil. At the worst point they were willing to pay almost $40 per barrel for anyone who would take the oil off of their hands. The price went from about $60pb in 2019 to a low of -$37 in April 2020.

  • Earth Day 2020, 50 years of Hind sight

    It is the 50th Earth Day and the world is generally locked down while we deal with the Coronavirus pandemic — and how best to ramp back up the world economy.

    50th Earth Day. April 22 2020

    The pandemic is a serious and sobering aspect to the fun and excitement to an otherwise interesting and informative day of rallies, speeches waterway cleanups and more…

    Worldwide we are going on 3M positive COVID19 cases and nearing 200,000 deaths. The US, never to be outdone in anything that seems competitive, has 32% of the cases and more than 25% of the deaths. Deaths in New York and New Jersey just passed 15,000 and 5,000 respectively. New England deaths exceed all other countries. It is hard to imagine this given that the virus had to cross the Pacific (to the west coast) or travel to Europe and then cross the pond to New England. The US has only 4.2% of the world’s population, yet 25% of the worlds deaths, and rising. How can that be?

    COVID19 Positive Cases and Deaths

               As of April 22, 2020
           Cases  %/World
    World 2,621,436 100.0%
     deaths 182,989 7.0%
    7.0%   %/World
    US 837,719 32.0%
     deaths 46,771 25.6%
    Deaths% 5.6%

    COVID has had a big toll on health and live and a wicked toll on the world’s economies. There some linings, and some of them silver, from this
    pandemic – currently and on the other side of it. Let’s think of a couple while
    we address what the other side of COVID might look like. First, if you think
    that we will ever get back to “normal”, you probably haven’t thought it through
    a lot.

    Pollution. The massive slowdown in the world economy has
    allowed the earth to take a breather. There are wonderful satellite views of
    China, Europe and the US, before and after pictures. Business as usual shows
    clouds of pollution followed by a few weeks of complete economic shutdown, and
    pristine-looking skies. Wow! There are similar pictures everywhere. Denver. LA, New York. The clear
    canals of Venice with fish and dolphin. 
    Pollution contributes to hundreds of millions of ailments every year, and to millions and millions of deaths. Let’s say 6 to 10 million people die each year because of air pollution. (See for example, this Forbes article in 2018.) Note that the infographic shows about 2.1M in the USA. Maybe the slowdown in the first quarter of 2020 will result in 1M people saved related to air pollution? 
    Once people get a taste of clean air, they tend not to want to return to smog and pollution.
    A Whole New Economy. The world economy will never be the same. For several reasons. First, what we came to think of as “normal” was never normal. We have undertaken to consume all the world’s fossil fuels in a few short centuries. We are fully beginning to realize the full costs of non-sustainable systems, the business-as-usual economy was never normal.
    Earth Overshoot day is a concept that is especially relevant to the first Earth Day in 1970. The resources we took and consumed from the earth — although maybe not sustainable and renewable — were fully supplied by the 1 planet we inhabit. That is, the 3.7B world population in 1970, staying with the same consumption patters, could live on the earth without depleting her resources. Think of this earth carrying capacity like you do a annual budget, it would be nice if the annual income lasted all year. But the population has more than doubled to 7.7B, and overall consumption has nearly doubled. Right now, the carrying capacity of Earth is exhausted about the end of July, only 57% of the way through the year! That’s 43% deficit spending for the rest of the year. To consume 43% more than the earth’s annual carrying capacity, we deplete resources like trees, fish and more.
    But, in 2020, the earth has gotten a bit of a breather. Overshoot day will improve dramatically!
    The economy will change. There will never be a “new normal”. People have gotten a taste of teleworking. It’s going to be hard to force people back into the offices that require an hour commute each way. Travel will take some time to come back, and business travel will never be the same. Stadium events will take some time to come back. Students have fully embraced online learning, and they will never fully go back.
    Consumption of fossil fuels are down at least 30% during the closed economy, but consumption may only bounce back half when the economy slowly starts to churn back.
    This might be the jump start that we all needed to step up a move toward sustainability. Assuming a 15% jump back, we would need to reduce our carbon footprint by 3% each and every year to have a 40% (overall) reduction by 2030, a 66% reduction by 2040, and near zero by 2050. Good news, we can easily move to 100% renewables by that time. (See Stanford Roadmap to 100% Renewable Energy by 2050 by country and also by major city.) And we can profitably move to 100% renewables if we include the health and death costs of fossil fuels.
    Hind sight is 2020. Every year since the turn of century as been in the hottest 20 some years, with many years breaking all time records. In fact, many months have hit monthly record highs, especially since 2015 (an El Nino year). January 2020 was hottest on record, and the oceans have never been hotter. Remember that carbon dioxide (CO2) persists in the environment for about 100 years from the time we introduce it by burning fossil fuels. As CO2 zooms from about 320ppm a hundred years ago to 415ppm now, the green house gasses will result in atmospheric heating for a century!
    Our linear economy was never “normal”, for this reason, and many others no one should consider using the term “new normal” on the other side of the COVID recession. Hopefully, with 2020, we will have a new respect for science and scientists.
    Let’s leverage this tragedy of COVID to make a real difference in our trajectory of the future.
    May every day be an Earth Day.

  • Solar 2020 and Sustainability: Looking for the Silver Lining

    Kelly Pickerel, Editor in Chief of Solar Power World
    magazine was cautiously optimistic in January when discussing the impact of US
    Import tariffs on the Solar industry and still solar installations were up 14%
    during 2019. She hoped that an even year, 2020, would bode well for solar.
    She concluded her opening letter by the editor in the January
    2020 Trends in Solar
    edition of SPW: “Superstitious or not, I’m crossing my
    fingers for a calm, prosperous year in solar. Knock on wood.”
    Wow! Nobody could have envisioned the coronavirus pandemic
    and its impact on all industries including solar. But, the environment is
    taking a breather: Environment
    Wins with Reduced Human Activity
    .
    During the Great Recession, Hall (2010) argued that a
    massive opportunity was lost by not by not focusing on sustainability related
    projects and human capital (education). He argued for spending more on specific
    infrastructure: especially energy efficiency and renewables. He liked projects
    that would pay back for decades while reducing our collective human footprint. Federal
    bailout funding should target, long-term, sustainable projects. The destructive
    innovation associated with recessions should allow industries (and companies)
    to fail if they are not sustainable.
    Make no doubt about it, the COVID Recession will be unlike
    anything we have ever seen before. It’s like putting parts of the economy in a
    self-induced coma, while waiting out the passage of the virus. However, waking
    up exactly where we left off is probably not going to happen. So, what’s the
    best way to move forward, and why not try to leverage this sudden break in the
    world’s business-as-usual routine into more permanent action on becoming more
    sustainable.
    Look for SustainZine blogs and articles on video meetings,
    teleschool, online university and telecommuting. We suddenly have reduced our
    carbon footprint worldwide by what, 20%. Not the way we would have liked to
    launch such a massive initiative, but let’s work with the deflection we are
    given.
    People are now at home more than ever, let’s get them to
    start monitoring their carbon footprint. How much are they saving by working,
    schooling and entertaining at home. Imagine someone reducing their carbon
    footprint by 35% in one week? for several weeks? Wouldn’t it be nice measure
    that savings and celebrate the win!? Wouldn’t it be nice to keep measuring the
    reduction in carbon footprint and continue to make incremental moves?
    The savings associated with remote work are huge. Once
    workers who can work remotely get the chance to do so, the genie will be out of
    the bottle. The savings are massive: employer, employee and environment. The
    reduction in carbon footprint immense. Measuring and monitoring the savings
    will justify the future workforce to frequently work remotely.
    For the homeowner, first would be energy efficiency, like
    insulation. Start with an energy audit.
    Then, with the reduced power usage, most homes should move
    to renewable energy (solar).
    Once we see and visualize the gains, it could become habit
    forming. Let’s keep our collective fingers crossed.
    See upcoming articles by Hall about the crazy profitable
    proposition for businesses to go solar, and for homeowners to feel good and
    save money by going solar.
    Mother Earth is our one and only habitable planet. It’s time
    we started taking better care of her. Maybe the coronavirus pandemic will be a
    wake-up call about how serious we all need to be about the health of our planet?
    References
    Hall, E. (2010). Lessons of
    recessions: Sustainability education and jobs may be the answer. Journal of Sustainability and Green
    Management
    . Jacksonville, FL: Academic and Business Research Institute.
    Retrieved from: http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/10659.pdf

  • Amazon? Lungs of the world? Sinking feeling?

    I got into this debate, related to Global Warming, on the “Amazon is sometimes referred to as the Lungs of the world.”
    Here’s a very readable discussion in Newsweek on how much oxygen comes from the Amazon: https://www.newsweek.com/how-much-oxygen-amazon-rain-forest-1456274
    Much like Global Freezing, I don’t know that I have ever heard/seen an actual scientist say this, but the Lungs of the World is still a pretty well circulated myth. Some times it says 20% of the oxygen in the world is produced by the Amazon Rain Forest. Actually, this is probably true, however the rainforest consumes most of the oxygen it produces. Plants (decomposition) consume it, animals in the forest, not so much so. Oxygen in the atmosphere is about 21% (20.95%, actually). And that’s not going to change much, even if the Amazon was burned to the ground… Carbon Dioxide (CO2) on the other hand, that’s not so pretty.
    There’s massive amounts of carbon stored in the trees and peat. That would all get moved from a stored state into the active environment (air and ocean). Same as chopping down 500 year-old native trees and burning them without replanting the same. Same as digging up coal that took 500m years to form and burning it (except that there’s no way to return the coal in coal back to the sync from whence it came).
    So, when the amazon is converted to grassland and ranching, the original carbon store is released into the atmosphere and the ability to store carbon (sync) is broken. Yes, grass is green, but it does a horrible job related to carbon sequestering compared to trees. Plus cows have a habit of belching and farting that releases a wicked amount of methane (32 to 64 times as potent a greenhouse gas as CO2).
    Of course, there horrific impact on the environment. You could easily call this a crime against humanity and against the environment when native populations are killed and displaced and the rainforest with all it inhabitants of plants and animals are killed and destroyed forever.
    National Geographic talks about the same issue, but follows on to discuss biodiversity: Why the Amazon doesn’t really produce 20% of the world’s oxygen: Of the many important reasons to worry about the thousands of fires raging in the world’s largest rainforest, oxygen supply is not one of them.

  • Opportunity Lost by Waiting until 2020 for Solar Investment

    [UPDATE: 30% Investment Tax Credit on renewables in the
    IRA Act 2022. See our Blog post here. This makes all the financial discussions
    below much more profitable. Also, higher inflation and higher power inflation.]

    The Renewable Investment Tax Credit, which is currently in
    2019 at 30% of the qualifying investment, is a wonderful incentive to put in
    renewable power including solar, wind and qualifying battery backup. The ITC
    will drop down by 4% in 2020 and then again by 4% in 2021. After 2021, the ITC
    drops off a cliff, to 10% for businesses and zero (0%) for residential. Here is
    the stepdown in Solar Investment Tax Credit (ITC): https://seia.org/initiatives/solar-investment-tax-credit-itc





















    You can still get your foot in the door on the tax credits
    in December. The “Safe Harbor” on ITC pertains to launching the investment in
    the current year and locking in that higher level of tax credit. The safe
    harbor allows businesses to take advantage of the current ITC rate even though
    they didn’t allow enough time to fully install this year. Generally, figure 5%
    or more down payment in the current year and continuous progress toward the
    finished project. One reason for the safe harbor, in general, is that someone
    might want to launch in 2020, but there is such an end-of-year demand for solar
    panels that it is not possible to get them before January 1st.
    Winter storms, trade storms, government permits during holidays, etc., might
    delay the full installation before the year ends.
    Safe Harbor requires continuous progress on the solar project,
    and there is a fixed deadline when the system must be completed to maintain the
    qualification for the higher tax credit. Here are some details on when the
    investment must start, and finalize, in order to be eligible for the higher
    ITC: https://www.foley.com/en/insights/publications/2019/09/solar-renewable-energy-investment-tax-credits

    Solar Example in December of 2019

    So let’s work an example for a business that has a $100,000
    solar investment in consideration in 2019. (See the table below.)
    First there’s the $30k tax credit that reduces the business tax
    liabilities, dollar for dollar. This is money that you simply do not pay out to
    the IRS. Then there’s the possibility of 100% depreciation of an asset in the
    first year, so the tax shield is based on the reduction in net income based on
    depreciation. (The tax shield is equal to the tax rate times the amount of
    depreciation; the asset basis is reduced by half of the ITC, or 33% of $85k in
    this example.) Therefore, the actual investment is only about 42% of the solar
    system costs, once all the tax benefits of the investment are considered. If
    the savings are $7,200 yearly (assuming no increases in power costs), then
    there’s a 17% return on investment each year. Simple payback is less than 6
    years!



    That is crazy profitable for a long-term investment. It is especially
    profitable when considering that the business is already committing to paying
    for power indefinitely from the power company. So, taking a loan of say 15
    years could result in loan payments that are lower than the payments for power,
    especially when considering that the power company raises rates (you should
    figure at least the rate of CPI inflation). At 2% power inflation, the net
    present value (NPV) of the investment jumps to $108k from about $75k (30 years
    at 4.5% loan rate).
    So the investment is profitable. Very profitable. But what
    if you want to do the investment next year? What is the cost of waiting? I’m
    glad you asked!
    With the safe harbor on Solar ITC you can lock in the ITC
    savings this year. You will need to put 5% down in 2019 and starting progress
    on the system. Here’s what your cashflow would look like for 2019: $30k ITC
    savings in taxes less the $5k deposit on the solar system. That’s a positive
    $25k cash flow this year.



    Since the investment tax credit drops by 4% (to 26% in 2020)
    the lost ITC is $4,000 if you buy the solar system and take the tax credit in
    2020. The $4,000 opportunity loss, compared to the $5,000 deposit in 2019 is only
    $1,000 difference. If you plan to do the solar system anyway, then the costs of delay are relatively large, especially when adding a year of power savings. The delay for a year could easily be a loss of $10k or
    more in opportunity lost.

    Solar is a Different Kind of Investment

    There are two major points, however, that make this
    different from most typical investment analyses. (Three, really, if you were to
    discuss the environmental savings, but that’s for another article.) First, the
    money your spending is committed money for power as long as the business is
    open and operating. Taking a loan to buy the solar system might prove to be
    cash positive indefinitely. Take $100,000 loan; pay interest only of $4,500
    (4.5%) for first year or two until you realize the tax benefits of the solar
    ITC and depreciation; apply the tax savings to the loan; and then make payments
    on the loan for 8 years. The loan payments could be about $1,000 less per year
    than what you would have paid in electric bills, especially as the cost of
    power from the utility company increase over time. Once the loan is paid off,
    the price of power that you generate for yourself is pure profit!
    Speaking of profit, here is the second point. Every dollar
    you reduce your power bill is pure profit. Things like smart thermostats, insulation,
    weather stripping, adjusting habits/processes, etc. might result in reducing
    the power bill by 5% to 25% at little or no out-of-pocket costs. That could
    result in a perpetuity of savings. If the firm’s cost of capital is, let’s say 8%,
    then the present value of the perpetuity of savings of $1,200 per year
    ($100/mo) would be $15,000 in present value terms. Plus, being more energy
    efficient means that a smaller system is required when going solar.
    An even more interesting concept related to energy savings
    is looking at the sales volume required to equal the $7,200 savings annually.
    If the firm has a 10% profit margin, the sales to cover the power bill is
    $72,000 per year (once the loan is payed off). In the current loan example,
    cash flows (savings really) are positive every year and go up based on power
    inflation. When the loan is payed off in year 11 you start to realize huge
    savings (profits).
    By the way, someone buying this property would pay more for
    the business because it comes with “free” electricity. A Lawrence-Berkley study
    found that some properties would appreciate by 20 times the annual electric
    savings. Therefore, the property might be worth about $144k more based on 20
    times the $7,200 annual savings. Since the net investment after taxes is about
    $42k, the property could appreciate about $102k over the solar investment.
    That’s a property appreciation of almost 3.5 times the net investment.

    In short, the investment in solar power can be crazy
    profitable. After January, it is not quite so crazy profitable. But, if you are
    planning to go solar in 2020, you need to seriously consider launching the
    project in 2019 and reaping the additional tax savings (and energy) savings.

    About SBP.
    Strategic Business Planning Company has been working on various telework, solar
    and energy efficiency projects. There are several factors that we consider in a
    more comprehensive analysis of a Solar investment that are not represented
    here. We also enjoy doing the planning associated with Intellectual Property
    (Patents) ventures; look for our Perpetual
    Innovation
    ™ line of books on patent commercialization.