Blog

  • The Patent KING: IBM for 28 years

    The Patent KING: IBM for 28 years

    IBM is again the leader in patents issued. That’s 28 years and running.  IBM had 9,130 patents issued in 2020, compared to the next highest, Samsung with 6,416.  There’s about 15 electronic and manufacturing companies with 2,000 to 3,000 patents issued. Note that all the top 10 are electronics and/or chip makers.  Forbes has a nice article by Roberts about the top 20 patent recipients of 2020

    Apple, the largest company by market cap ($2.1T), is 8th with 2,792 patents. Apple is starting to get serious about batteries and autos.

    Amazon and Google are the only two in the top 20 that are not electronics and/or manufacturing. Amazon (2,244 patents) comes up at 11th. Google at 17th had 1,817 patents issued. The automakers of Toyota and Ford are 14th and 15th.

    A couple years ago, Samsung kinda dethroned the King as discussed in our 2017 blog post: The End of a Patent Dynasty, IBM has Been Dethroned. Samsung, including all of its related companies, with lots and lots of design patents, outpaced IBM in 2016. For 2020, Samsung Display company had 1,902 patents, so Samsung, as a consortium of companies, again rivals IBM in total patents.

    GE, even though it is a shell of it’s former mega company, is still in the top 18, with 1,760 patents.  GE continues to divest of various business unites including financials to focus on a few core business like turbines, renewables, transportation and healthcare. 

    A Bloomberg article by Brody Ford on March 12 2021 discusses IBM as more of a Godfather of Patents than a King. With more that 38,000 active patents and a spectacular war chest of patent licenses, or cross licenses, IBM is a force to be reckoned with. Ford discussed Chewy fighting back, kind of the dog nipping at the heels of the King (or the Godfather). IBM is way down from the times when it was customary to produce $1B a year from licensing royalties. Patent revenues peaked at $1.7B in 2000 and then again in 2016 at $1.6B. The patent landscape has changed. One thing that Ford alluded to, but didn’t fully address, is that IBM has significantly changed the way they approach patent commercialization. If they can’t directly use patents, they seem to be doing a much better job of figuring out ways to commercialize. If they sell the patent, that, I believe, would not show up in their patent revenues which reflects royalty streams. 

    In the meanwhile, IBM is on a multi-decade move to upgrade the company to more relevant businesses and business models. Mainframes are only needed for businesses in “as a service” models (SaaS). 

    IBM is a leader in Quantum computing and in blockchain. IBM is actually my way to play the blockchain mega trend and avoid the mania associated with various bits and bytes of cyber coins. 

  • Stop Gaming GameStop, Robinhood. Hold em, or Fold em?

    What’s up
    with the Stock Market(s)? Feb 8, 2021 the various stock market indexes all hit
    all time highs. Wow. First off, Trump was very business friendly – some would
    argue too business friendly (at the expense of the environment and labor. But
    the market has chugged happily upward based on the likelihood of a Biden win
    and the certainty of it after the election. Markets don’t like uncertainty, and
    Trump has been a wildcard on many things like trade and certain industries. But
    historically the markets have gone up after a presidential election no matter which
    party wins. Of course, there are sector winners (renewables) and losers (oil,
    coal and gas).

    Major US Stock Indexes for Year ending Feb 8 2021. S&P, DOW, Russel 2000, NASAQ QQQ


    The current
    stock market is betting on another massive stimulus package and trillions of
    dollars sloshing around in the economy. The interesting thing about the
    mid-2020, the December and the upcoming stimulus is where all these boatloads
    of money go. Many people have been working from home, making roughly the same
    amount of money, and no good place to spend it. Savings rates were about 35%
    from the first round, vs some 10% typical. There’s a limit to how much time and
    money you can spend on your house. There’s a limit to how many vehicles you need
    when you are working from home. Fixed income investing yields nearly zero
    percent (real) return.

    How about,
    let’s go gamble – I mean invest – in the stock market. And we did. They call us
    “Retail” investors (or individual investors) because we go out and buy stocks
    on our own without the adult supervision of brokers and money managers. A whole
    new group of investors were born using platforms like Robinhood and forming
    investment forums in places like Reddit.

    On the other
    hand, there’s the institutional investors that have large investment portfolios
    for pensions and such. Money managers have to be in a bull market or else they
    miss the boat, look bad by reasonable comparison, lose money in their funds,
    and get fired. Then there’s the hedge funds that use leverage and options to
    make profits when the market goes up, when the market goes down, and especially
    when there’s lots of volatility.

    The basic
    stock options are puts and calls. You can buy a call option for a specific strike
    price in a specific month (usually the 3rd Friday of the month is
    when options expire). If I think that Apple (AAPL) is going to go up, I can buy
    a contract for 100 shares of apple in the future, say March. Apple is currently
    at $136 (Feb 8, 2021). If I purchased 100 shares I would need $13,600, but I
    could buy a contract to buy 100 shares of AAPL at $150 strike price in March
    for a paltry $.80 per share. That’s $80 for 1 contract, plus some brokerage
    fees. If the stock price goes up, the value of the option goes up dramtically.
    But, if it doesn’t go all the way to $150 or higher by the expiration date, the
    option becomes worthless, I lose my $80 per contract, and the person who sold
    it to me still has their 100 shares of apple, plus an extra $80 for the
    inconvenience. If Apple goes above $150 by early march, the option is “in the
    money”, i.e., it will execute at that level on expiration Friday. If AAPL goes
    to $152.80 at expiration, then I will automatically own 100 shares of AAPL at
    the strike price of $150. Although I do have to fork over a lot of money ($150
    x 100 = $15,000), I am getting $15,280 worth of stock that I can immediately
    sell. So I made $2.80 per share, but it originally cost me $.80 a share for the
    call contract. Usually, I don’t hold my call options for Apple until expiration,
    I just sell my options for a profit or a loss a before expiration.

    If the stock
    goes up, say 5%, the strike price becomes much more attainable and the options
    value may go up 20% or 30%. Of course, the same is true of a drop to amplify
    the losses! But, the most I can lose in the case is $.80 on my long bet.

    Brokerages
    are so nice, they will lend you money to buy “on margin”. If you had $100,000
    that you invested today in stocks, for example, you could borrow maybe 50% on
    margin, meaning that you could buy another $50,000 in stock to go with your
    cash purchases. When the market (or your specific stocks) are going up, you are
    doing the happy dance!:-) But, when things go south, you could end up getting
    crushed. The higher volatile stocks that you were borrowing against may become more
    risky and move to 0% marginable. The leverage that helped you expand your
    purchasing power by 50% will increase your losses on the way down. The
    brokerage might even issue a “Margin Call”, and start selling off your (good)
    stocks to cover your margin. Ouch. Ouch! And Double OUCH!!!

    You can buy
    stocks, and you can buy options, with a long position (expecting the stock
    price to go up) or a short position (expecting the stock price to go down). Hedge
    funds sometimes get into stocks (via options) when they anticipate something
    big happening. If they expected the company to be struggling and maybe even go
    out of business they could bet short and make a lot of money doing so. In fact,
    just the attention by hedge fund (short interest) can make a struggling company
    have even more problems and even put them into bankruptcy. For a $20 stock, let’s
    say for example GameStop (GME) they might bet it would drop and have options to
    sell stock on expiration at, let’s say $25. These contracts are 100 shares
    each. What if the hedge fund has agreed to a contract to deliver, say, 1
    million shares of GME at $25 at expiration in Feb, BUT they don’t actually own
    any shares in the gaming company. Risky shorts find themselves in this
    position. This is called “Naked Shorts”. The hedger has to buy stock on the
    open market to cover their shorts. This is called a short squeeze. At one point
    the shorted shares for GME were more than 150% of all available shares. And as
    GME kept rising and rising, up to almost $500 per share, the pain of the
    squeeze and the struggle to cover the naked shorts got worse and worse. The
    Robinhood gamers just kept piling in. This is for a stock that was under $3 per
    share at the bottom of the COVID recession in March 2020. People who rode the
    stock down for $400 to $60 are probably pretty sad right now. There’s no good
    reason that it won’t return to $20 or even lower.

    It’s funning
    that the Crowds have been rooting for the underdogs, the Robinhooders. Some
    hedge funds have been crushed. Regulators think there’s something they should
    do. Assuming that there’s nothing criminal going on, they are probably just
    billowing smoke. In the meanwhile the Robinhooders and Reddit gangs have taken
    on other targets like American Airlines (AAL), AMC, silver and others.

    Feel free to
    follow the Reddit gangs. This may be the best thing to happen to younger
    investors where they make investments, hopefully in addition to the retirement
    plans (IRAs, 401K). Make sure to use your “Mad Money”, not your life savings.
    Try to take your winnings out of any profitable play and maybe let some of your
    winnings ride. This gaming the market and betting. In the wise words of Kenny
    Rogers: “You got to know when to hold em, know when to fold em; know when to
    walk away; and know when to run.”

    GameStop (GME) Stock Price for Month ending Feb 8 2021


    #Robinhood #Investing #Reddit #Options #LosingYourShorts #IntellZine #SBPlan #IPPlan

     

  • Sustainability in EDU Over last 20 years

    The SustainZine has been blogging (although rather sporadically)
    for 11 years. Wow!. One of the first blogs was related to an article (and a SAM
    presentation) by Hall, Tayler, Zapalski and Hall (2009). It focused on
    sustainability in Higher ED, specifically on how the facilities of universities
    were doing sustainability initiatives but there were few actual classes on
    Sustainability. The classroom, i.e., the future of sustainability was far
    behind.

    Later in 2010 Hall (2010) published an article on Lessons of recessions: Sustainability
    education and jobs may be the answer.
     (SustainZine
    Blog post here
    .) This article discusses the Great Recession of 2007-2008.
    Make no doubt about the pandemic of 2020, it too was a recession so destructive
    innovation has been (and will continue to be) the result.

    People needed to go back to school during the Great Recession
    to up their skills and to avoid the big blank spot on their resume that comes
    from prolonged unemployment. But, universities continued with the same EDU
    programs as if nothing had changed. Universities were taking on Law students,
    for example, even though we were swimming with a glut of lawyers. Hall argued
    that programs of the future, like sustainability, might be a much better
    training program; it might be a differentiator when compared to a glut of the
    regular degree program graduates.

    Over the last 10 years there have been numerous
    Sustainability programs created and many “sustainability” classes created
    within almost every discipline of many universities and Tech Schools.

    Green jobs have outpaced almost all other job categories. See the Green Job forecasts from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Solar and Wind technicians are in high demand, but so are all the environmental cleanup specializations. 

    Here’s the SustainZine blog on Sustainability in Education
    post from
    Jan 19, 2010
    .

    Sustainability
    in Education?

    Even
    though campuses are getting greener, the classes are not.

    A big study of campuses, the Campus Report Card, by the NWF (with
    others) showed how much various schools are doing in terms of sustainability.
    They are doing a lot on campus but not much teaching of the concepts in the
    classroom. (Also see some recent research on Generation E.)

    The Campus Report Card is actually two
    similar studies, on in 2001 and one in 2008. They show that the course
    offerings of environmental and sustainability programs essentially reduced by
    half. That is, the average student in 2001 had an 8% chance of having an
    sustainability/environment class, but that dropped in half to 4% chance by
    2008.

    In fact the worst educational department was teachers education. “Teacher
    education, that program that trains K-12 teachers, has about a 15% chance of
    being able to take a course on sustainability within their major”
    (Hall et al., 2009, p. 17).

    The best guess as to why this drop happened is because of two forces. First,
    and probably foremost, the prices of oil were really low until after this
    2008 study was completed (and then they shot up to ~$150 per barrel). Second,
    the Bush/Chaney administration was friendly to oil interests and not so
    friendly to environmental interests (no links to environmental sites
    comments on this since this is a family-friendly site).

    Can we move forward with Sustainability in the US without educating on the
    subject?
    Tell us what you think?

    Reference
    Hall, E., Taylor, S., Zapalski, C., & Hall, T. (2009). Sustainability
    in education: Green in the facilities, but not in the classrooms. Proceedings
    of the Society for Advancement of Management, USA.

    Hall, E.
    (2010). Lessons of recessions: Sustainability education and jobs may be the
    answer. 
    Journal of Sustainability and Green Management. Jacksonville, FL: Academic and Business Research Institute.
    Retrieved from: 
    http://www.aabri.com/OC2010Manuscripts/OC10079.pdf  

  • WEF Global Risks Report for Scenario Plans

    The Global Risks Report 2021, 16th Ed., Insight Report, was just released by the World Economic Forum (WEF). This is one of the best places in the world to gather ideas for scenario planning, especially Chapter 1 on Fractured Futures. Essentially, this report is scenario planning, but for the whole of the world, and then on a region-by-region basis. So, a government, a business, or a non-profit organization can simply review these risks, adapt the concepts to your locale and situation, and wa-la, you have scenarios to plug into your scenario planning workshop. Of course, multiple risks might have similar results for your organization; for example, disaster recovery planning might be similar for man-made disasters as well as natural disasters.

    (more…)
  • Renewable Investment Tax Credit (ITC) is Extended Two Years

     

    Good news, as of January 2021 the ITC has been extended at 26% for 2021 and 2022. See Solar Energy Industry Association (SEIA) discussion on the investment tax credit (ITC) here: Solar ITC Rate Per Year

    This means that the calculator we developed for residential and for business solar investments will still be accurate for the next two years. (See our Solar Profit Calculator page.)

    Woo Hoo! Happy Days!:-)

    During that time Biden administration should start to remove the fossil fuel subsidies, meaning that renewables should continue to take share from coal, oil and gas. There’s two other things that Biden will likely do: extend renewable incentives; and, institute a cost structure for carbon. Only the renewed incentives was likely before the US Senate went 50+1 for the Democrats. Something like a gas tax increase or a cap-and-trade program was highly unlikely just a month ago.