Blog

  • The Energy Roadmap – The Edison of our Age: Stan Ovshinsky … Who killed the Electric Car?… a who dun it of history.

    Ovshinsky is compared to Edison as a prolific inventor… He hold patents on NiMH batteries. His solar cells power the MIR space station.
    Good question on Cobasys and the restrictions on next-gen batteries by the patents held within the company.!:-) The batteries that have become so critical in the next generation of batteries, electric cars, etc. are subject to patents by Ovshinsky (and the Cobasys company).
    Cobasys is a 50/50 joint venture with Chevron/Texico and Ovonics. Ovonics has the Stan Ovshinsky inventions and GM now has a big ownership stake in that company.
    So let’s see, a BIG oil and a BIG auto have a BIG stake in the very batteries that make an electric car viable.
    Look at “Patent encumbrances” at Wikipedia. The discussion on “Who Killed the Electric Car?” seem far truer than I ever imagined. This whole topic requires a lot more reading. But before picking up the thread again, I want to watch the movie.
    Anybody out there have big ideas (substantiated by facts, I hope) on the issue.
    Keywords: electric car, EV, oil, auto, battery, patent, patent encumbrances, inventor, Ovshinsky 

    See similar blog over in www.SustainZine.com

  • The Energy Roadmap – The Edison of our Age: Stan Ovshinsky and the Future of Energy [Video Interview Part 1]

    The Energy Roadmap – The Edison of our Age: Stan Ovshinsky and the Future of Energy [Video Interview Part 1]:

    Ovshinsky is compared to Edison as a prolific inventor… He hold patents on NiMH batteries. His solar cells power the MIR space station.

    Good question on Cobasys and the restrictions on next-gen batteries by the patents held within the company.!:-) The batteries that have become so critical in the next generation of batteries, electric cars, etc. are subject to patents by Ovshinsky (and the Cobasys company).

    Cobasys is a 50/50 joint venture with Chevron/Texico and Ovonics. Ovonics has the Stan Ovshinsky inventions and GM now has a big ownership stake in that company.

    So let’s see, a BIG oil and a BIG auto have a BIG stake in the very batteries that make an electric car viable.

    Look at “Patent encumbrances” at Wikipedia. The discussion on “Who Killed the Electric Car?” seem far truer than I ever imagined. This whole topic requires a lot more reading. But before picking up the thread again, I want to watch the movie.

    Anybody out there have big ideas (substantiated by facts, I hope) on the issue.

    Keywords: electric car, EV, oil, auto, battery, patent, patent encumbrances, inventor,

    ‘via Blog this’

  • China Pollution Is Blanketing America’s West Coast – Business Insider

    China Pollution Is Blanketing America’s West Coast – Business Insider:

    Oh boy.

    We export raw materials and coal to China so they can make finished goods and export them back to us in the West/USA. They don’t have the safety worries that we do… Some of the externalities affect only China, but many affect us all, especially those countries and environments closer to the mainland of China.

    “Cities like Los Angeles received at least an extra day of smog a year from nitrogen oxide and carbon monoxide from China’s export-dependent factories, it said.

    “We’ve outsourced our manufacturing and much of our pollution, but some of it is blowing back across the Pacific to haunt us,” co-author Steve Davis, a scientist at University of California Irvine, said.”

    Yuk! 🙁

    A good economist would argue that  products (say coal, especially the really dirty, high sulfur stuff) that produce negative externalities should be assessed a tax that roughly matches the costs of the externality. Using this logic, we would tax coal (especially high sulfur coal) that goes to a developing country, and tax them even more if they intend to burn the coal without scrubbers and such. This might not stop them from burning coal, but it would make other options more attractive that are cleaner (less negative externalities).

    Unfortunately, China has a LOT of coal in the country. They now burn more than half the world’s coal each year, so they do have to import it as well.

    ‘via Blog this’

  • References Cited Per Patent are up 250% in 10 years | Patently-O

    References Cited Per Patent | Patently-O:

    This is interesting how the number of issued patents cited have gone up from about 20 total patents references to about 50.  Over the last 10 years! WOW.

    The additional references from the examiner appears to be consistent at about 5 to 7; but as the comments indicate, some of those may already have already been mentioned in some form by the applicant.

    That is a 250% increase in the number of patents being mention in a patent application.

    Reasons are definitely up for debate!

    WOW!

    ‘via Blog this’

  • Secrecy cloaks patents on inventions in Canada: NSA for IP

    Secrecy cloaks patents on inventions hidden far from public eye by Industry Canada:

    Wow.
    So in Canada you can have your patent applications totally shielded from all view/publication. And, we presume, against your will and better judgement. But only for National Security.

    One would assume, that you will have lots of problems, then, if you were to consider bringing it to market commercially (non-military).

    And, here in the US of A, we are grappling with how best to spy on our citizens. (President Obama’s news conference today. See here on News conference.

    Patent applications are the agreement between government and inventor to arrange and organized disclosure of inventions and grant monopoly power over that invention for up to 20 years. US patent law & USPTO.gov.

    Public disclosure is a key word here.

    This is kind of interesting: secret patents. Canada must be taking its lead from the NSA!:-(

    Don’t you love it.?!

    ‘via Blog this’